Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="muffin_of_chaos" data-source="post: 4202414" data-attributes="member: 65007">This is known as the Cleric.&nbsp; Or any other ranged character that can support the group.It's definitely not a Bard.&nbsp; But it can be a bard, if you want it to be.Actual Bard rules will be coming out in a year, sorry if you can't wait, but in my personal opinion 4E makes making new classes super-easy, with the system's newly-integrated class mechanics.Unfortunately, the number of players that want to play Bards is in the minority, and the majority constitutes &quot;the players&quot; in a more compelling sense.&nbsp; Minorities always have it rougher when it comes to a popularly-supported franchise.When 3.0 came out, it had a couple more classes than 4E.&nbsp; But they, in total, had fewer abilities and worse flexibility of customization.It's a fair number of people who don't want to go to the lengths of creating their own class to suit their specific and uncommon tastes.You should take Precocious down there up on 'is/'er challenge anyway.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="muffin_of_chaos, post: 4202414, member: 65007"] This is known as the Cleric. Or any other ranged character that can support the group. It's definitely not a Bard. But it can be a bard, if you want it to be. Actual Bard rules will be coming out in a year, sorry if you can't wait, but in my personal opinion 4E makes making new classes super-easy, with the system's newly-integrated class mechanics. Unfortunately, the number of players that want to play Bards is in the minority, and the majority constitutes "the players" in a more compelling sense. Minorities always have it rougher when it comes to a popularly-supported franchise. When 3.0 came out, it had a couple more classes than 4E. But they, in total, had fewer abilities and worse flexibility of customization. It's a fair number of people who don't want to go to the lengths of creating their own class to suit their specific and uncommon tastes. You should take Precocious down there up on 'is/'er challenge anyway. [/QUOTE]

Verification