Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Olaf the Stout" data-source="post: 5831839" data-attributes="member: 13703">I just rolled up a second set of stats using 3d6 for stats.&nbsp; The stats rolled were decidedly average.&nbsp; Strength, in particular, had a 13 and then nothing higher than a 9.The Wild stat rolls were slightly above average (11, 13, 11, 10, 15, 13), which would offset some of the low stats.&nbsp; Funnily enough I rolled a second set of Wild stats using 4d6, drop the lowest and got lower numbers! (10, 10, 11, 11, 15, 11)So I don't know that 3d6 as a rolling method will work.&nbsp; I may have to go with rolling 4d6, drop the lowest, but have the number of rolls = the number of players.Another possible option I'm thinking of to give me a result in line with what I am after (some high and some low stats) is after you have your stats, pick one stat and add 2 to it (max 18).&nbsp; Then take 2 away from your lowest stat.Thoughts?Olaf the Stout</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Olaf the Stout, post: 5831839, member: 13703"] I just rolled up a second set of stats using 3d6 for stats. The stats rolled were decidedly average. Strength, in particular, had a 13 and then nothing higher than a 9. The Wild stat rolls were slightly above average (11, 13, 11, 10, 15, 13), which would offset some of the low stats. Funnily enough I rolled a second set of Wild stats using 4d6, drop the lowest and got lower numbers! (10, 10, 11, 11, 15, 11) So I don't know that 3d6 as a rolling method will work. I may have to go with rolling 4d6, drop the lowest, but have the number of rolls = the number of players. Another possible option I'm thinking of to give me a result in line with what I am after (some high and some low stats) is after you have your stats, pick one stat and add 2 to it (max 18). Then take 2 away from your lowest stat. Thoughts? Olaf the Stout [/QUOTE]

Verification