Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Characters made only for combat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="barsoomcore" data-source="post: 766201" data-attributes="member: 812"><p><strong>Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bad character, or bad role playing, or bad DM?</strong></p><p></p><p>Well, duh. So what?</p><p></p><p>The fact that a character isn't good at something doesn't make them a bad character. You're saying that since this guy made a character that can't sweet-talk the town guard, he should be punished? Or discouraged from making such characters? Rubbish.</p><p></p><p>A character who sucks at things other than melee combat doesn't prevent the campaign from including things other than melee combat. He's just not going to be very good at those things.</p><p></p><p>And that's okay. That's fun, even. There's plenty of characters who aren't much good at melee combat. Should they be punished, too?</p><p></p><p>This whole debate is just silly. If you'd play the game using the rules, this would be a non-issue. Charisma matters for Charisma-related things. Duh. If a player wants to create a character with a low Charisma (not like 8 is all that low), then that's great. If they then want to try using their Charisma skills to influence people, well, they're going to have less luck than other characters.</p><p></p><p>If he thinks he should get bonuses for cool descriptions, you either rule that he does or he doesn't. I reward players for innovative ideas and give bonuses in all situations if a player describes something with particular imagination and flair. Combat, the ball, the market, whatever. Never more than +2 (and that only for really outrageous notions) but sure. A player who's really trying hard and paying attention? Why not reward him?</p><p></p><p>And if he gives you a good description, gets a +1 and still rolls crappy because of his lack of skill points, have fun describing how the social reject screwed up his attempt to be smooth and charming. You'd do the same thing if the wizard rolled a 1 on his attack roll, wouldn't you?</p><p></p><p>Or don't give bonuses for cool descriptions and be done with it. Easy.</p><p></p><p>Sheesh. Let's get back to something interesting, like the protein content of tuna water, okay?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="barsoomcore, post: 766201, member: 812"] [b]Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Bad character, or bad role playing, or bad DM?[/b] Well, duh. So what? The fact that a character isn't good at something doesn't make them a bad character. You're saying that since this guy made a character that can't sweet-talk the town guard, he should be punished? Or discouraged from making such characters? Rubbish. A character who sucks at things other than melee combat doesn't prevent the campaign from including things other than melee combat. He's just not going to be very good at those things. And that's okay. That's fun, even. There's plenty of characters who aren't much good at melee combat. Should they be punished, too? This whole debate is just silly. If you'd play the game using the rules, this would be a non-issue. Charisma matters for Charisma-related things. Duh. If a player wants to create a character with a low Charisma (not like 8 is all that low), then that's great. If they then want to try using their Charisma skills to influence people, well, they're going to have less luck than other characters. If he thinks he should get bonuses for cool descriptions, you either rule that he does or he doesn't. I reward players for innovative ideas and give bonuses in all situations if a player describes something with particular imagination and flair. Combat, the ball, the market, whatever. Never more than +2 (and that only for really outrageous notions) but sure. A player who's really trying hard and paying attention? Why not reward him? And if he gives you a good description, gets a +1 and still rolls crappy because of his lack of skill points, have fun describing how the social reject screwed up his attempt to be smooth and charming. You'd do the same thing if the wizard rolled a 1 on his attack roll, wouldn't you? Or don't give bonuses for cool descriptions and be done with it. Easy. Sheesh. Let's get back to something interesting, like the protein content of tuna water, okay? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Characters made only for combat
Top