Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="BobTheNob" data-source="post: 5354421" data-attributes="member: 82425">I sort of agree with this. Lets say a target has something Akin to Blur, but more of an invisibility take where it is &quot;invisible to creatures more than 5 squares away&quot;. A given party member IS more than 5 away, but can reach the creature with a charge, and has a reasonable idea of the location of the creature (i.e. has seen where its Fire attacks have been originating from). Should the party member be allowed to charge?My take is yes. He knows roughly where the creature is and will spot it once he gets close enough. Good enough for me. I guess my point is NOT whether they can see the target at the start of their turn, but can they see the creature DURING the movement.I have always played whether party members can charge as a subjective decision, with my rule of thumb being can they run a straight line at the target. But after that, its up to DM'ing skills (and rule lawyers be damned!)</blockquote>

[QUOTE="BobTheNob, post: 5354421, member: 82425"] I sort of agree with this. Lets say a target has something Akin to Blur, but more of an invisibility take where it is "invisible to creatures more than 5 squares away". A given party member IS more than 5 away, but can reach the creature with a charge, and has a reasonable idea of the location of the creature (i.e. has seen where its Fire attacks have been originating from). Should the party member be allowed to charge? My take is yes. He knows roughly where the creature is and will spot it once he gets close enough. Good enough for me. I guess my point is NOT whether they can see the target at the start of their turn, but can they see the creature DURING the movement. I have always played whether party members can charge as a subjective decision, with my rule of thumb being can they run a straight line at the target. But after that, its up to DM'ing skills (and rule lawyers be damned!) [/QUOTE]

Verification