Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Charismatic Blademaster?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DracoSuave" data-source="post: 4505413" data-attributes="member: 71571"><p>Depends tho. A Fire-based Swordmage can't ignore strength no matter which Aegis he takes because his basic attacks are not what his strength is bolstering, but rather the secondary effects of his powers, and no feat mitigates that. The prot-spec Swami doesn't make a lot of basic attacks anyways in comparison, and won't get as much value from IBM</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This is possible because Paladins don't have a class feature that has the words 'basic melee attack' in it. Their class feature is geared around their Charisma stat, and it's only the standard OAs they have to deal with. Swordmages, on the other hand, have a build that includes the basic attack as part of its effect, and that is why it is a different matter for a swordmage to get a basic-attack bolstering feat.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>-Some- swordmages don't. A Lightning Swami only cares about Strength if he goes Assault without the feat, none of his actual powers revolve around it. He also only cares about Constitution for a singular at-will that can take it or leave it, but this reduced attribute requirement hurts him in the benefit he gets from weapon feats dept. Cold Swamis care -heavily- about Constitution, and Fire Swamis care -heavily- about Strength, because of where the chips lie with their -powers-. </p><p></p><p>The only times a Swordmage cares about basic attacks is:</p><p>A) Aegis of Assault</p><p>B) OAs</p><p>C) Charging.</p><p></p><p>Swamis who spec to charging take the powers that replace the basic attack on charges -anyways-, which means they'll be taking AoA regardless, and are already ignoring Strength on their charges. Swamis also aren't OA-based as much as Fighters, so that's not as important -either.-</p><p></p><p>The presence of the feat doesn't change how a Swami's powers work once you actually get to the power list, and -that-, more than the Aegis, is what -defines- how your Swordmage actually plays and works.</p><p></p><p>The equivalent for a Paladin, by the way, is allowing them to substitute Str for Cha in Divine Challenge.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DracoSuave, post: 4505413, member: 71571"] Depends tho. A Fire-based Swordmage can't ignore strength no matter which Aegis he takes because his basic attacks are not what his strength is bolstering, but rather the secondary effects of his powers, and no feat mitigates that. The prot-spec Swami doesn't make a lot of basic attacks anyways in comparison, and won't get as much value from IBM This is possible because Paladins don't have a class feature that has the words 'basic melee attack' in it. Their class feature is geared around their Charisma stat, and it's only the standard OAs they have to deal with. Swordmages, on the other hand, have a build that includes the basic attack as part of its effect, and that is why it is a different matter for a swordmage to get a basic-attack bolstering feat. -Some- swordmages don't. A Lightning Swami only cares about Strength if he goes Assault without the feat, none of his actual powers revolve around it. He also only cares about Constitution for a singular at-will that can take it or leave it, but this reduced attribute requirement hurts him in the benefit he gets from weapon feats dept. Cold Swamis care -heavily- about Constitution, and Fire Swamis care -heavily- about Strength, because of where the chips lie with their -powers-. The only times a Swordmage cares about basic attacks is: A) Aegis of Assault B) OAs C) Charging. Swamis who spec to charging take the powers that replace the basic attack on charges -anyways-, which means they'll be taking AoA regardless, and are already ignoring Strength on their charges. Swamis also aren't OA-based as much as Fighters, so that's not as important -either.- The presence of the feat doesn't change how a Swami's powers work once you actually get to the power list, and -that-, more than the Aegis, is what -defines- how your Swordmage actually plays and works. The equivalent for a Paladin, by the way, is allowing them to substitute Str for Cha in Divine Challenge. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Charismatic Blademaster?
Top