Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="trix" data-source="post: 343715" data-attributes="member: 5337">...Anyone read my idea on voting ?Voting needs to be done on a peer review basis.  That means that people submitting their entries need to vote on which they think are the best.If we can get a couple hundred, maybe a 1000 submissions then we should get at least the top 50 dedicated thinkers who should be the top 50 entrants.  (remember, WotC setting search pulled in and advertied in more places than ENWorld would probably advertise)With maybe a panel of judges to cut down to 50, entries, the rest of the process should be controlled by those 50... so that there are 50 judges that are judging 50, then 10, then 3, then 2 entries.Very open and clean.In addition, if there are some intrestingly "different" entries, then we should embrace them aslong as everyone likes them.  Unlike the WotC setting search, this should be "anything" goes, by gamers, for gamers.... but the setting should have swords and trolls as a bare minimum.(This leaves things like shadowrun wide open, but keeps to the gothic shadowy background that exists in both shadowrun and D&D).We could do the judging right here on ENWorld.  Have someone at enworld act as submission coordinator.  All entries get pasted into a forum in which only the firstround judges get access to.They then each putforward their memorable 20 settings.  We would need 10 judges.  This should bring 20 to 200 settings into the closing of the first round.Each of those members should then have the opportunity to add one page to their proposal.Those 20-200 (ideally 50) then vote among themselves on what are the most appropriate 10.Those 10 then go back and write 10 page proposals.The 50 vote on the best 3Those 3 go and create a 40 page document.The 3 are then reduced to 1.One Setting to rule them all,One Search to find them,One Annoucement to bring them all,and on ENWorld bind them.-Tim</blockquote>

Verification