Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DaveStebbins" data-source="post: 2631644" data-attributes="member: 1427">When I bother to cruise the Wizards boards I often see "we need more adventures" threads started and posted to by people with no idea that third-party published D&D compatible adventures even exist (I make sure to educate them). And these are people tuned in enough to be on the WotC boards (no other judgements will be made about them in this post  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> ).That a sizeable portion of gamers aren't aware of, or just won't ever use, third-party published accessories makes the d20 market very small to begin with. Suggesting that lots of third-party publishers should be continually seeding the even smaller d20 adventure module market, is... optimistic... at best.I've said it before, I believe that Wizards greatly over-estimated how accepted third-party material would be under the OGL and d20 STL. The continuous clamor for adventures from WotC has caused them to re-evaluate how much they have to invest in low-profit adventures to prime the sales of the profit-making supplements they'd rather be selling.-Dave</blockquote>