Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Charles Ryan on Adventures
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 2635064" data-attributes="member: 22779"><p>I'd like to second this point of view. I'm not a developer, and I don't want to be. I do buy d20 products from time to time, but, only after a great deal of research and knowing exactly what I want. I'd been stung too many times in 3e buying crap to want to shell out cash for something that lines my catbox.</p><p></p><p>I've gotten so bad about not wanting to make radical changes to mechanics that I still refuse to even look at psionics. I know lots of people say glowing things about the XPH, but, in all honesty, why do I want to plow through another couple of hundred pages of rules, when I could simply create a sorcerer with a different spell list, give him some different feats, and call him a psionicist? Why do I need an entire new ruleset when the one I've got works?</p><p></p><p>To be quite honest, that's why things like AE, IH, et al don't interest me all that much. I actually LIKE 3.5 mechanics. I have no major complaints. I have no idea if I'm in some tiny minority here, but, really, I think there are a number of gamers like me who don't want to spend the next year or two working out new rules, we just want to game. Add in a new PrC? No worries, we can do that. Add in a new class? Not a big deal, done it before. Spend the next few months figuring out a complete rework the spell system into a point based system? Huh? What? No thanks.</p><p></p><p>I personally think Mr Mearls has hit it quite well. The d20 crowd seems to be cranking out variant games time and time again and, well, I don't want to play a variant game. I want to play DnD. And, judging by the WOTC numbers, I'd say that there are lots of people like me who aren't terribly interested in reinventing the wheel with every new book. Gimme something I can port directly into my game with a minimum of work and I'll buy it every time. Gimme something that's going to bite into my very small amount of free time before I can even begin to use it? I'll pass.</p><p></p><p>Just a couple of coppers.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 2635064, member: 22779"] I'd like to second this point of view. I'm not a developer, and I don't want to be. I do buy d20 products from time to time, but, only after a great deal of research and knowing exactly what I want. I'd been stung too many times in 3e buying crap to want to shell out cash for something that lines my catbox. I've gotten so bad about not wanting to make radical changes to mechanics that I still refuse to even look at psionics. I know lots of people say glowing things about the XPH, but, in all honesty, why do I want to plow through another couple of hundred pages of rules, when I could simply create a sorcerer with a different spell list, give him some different feats, and call him a psionicist? Why do I need an entire new ruleset when the one I've got works? To be quite honest, that's why things like AE, IH, et al don't interest me all that much. I actually LIKE 3.5 mechanics. I have no major complaints. I have no idea if I'm in some tiny minority here, but, really, I think there are a number of gamers like me who don't want to spend the next year or two working out new rules, we just want to game. Add in a new PrC? No worries, we can do that. Add in a new class? Not a big deal, done it before. Spend the next few months figuring out a complete rework the spell system into a point based system? Huh? What? No thanks. I personally think Mr Mearls has hit it quite well. The d20 crowd seems to be cranking out variant games time and time again and, well, I don't want to play a variant game. I want to play DnD. And, judging by the WOTC numbers, I'd say that there are lots of people like me who aren't terribly interested in reinventing the wheel with every new book. Gimme something I can port directly into my game with a minimum of work and I'll buy it every time. Gimme something that's going to bite into my very small amount of free time before I can even begin to use it? I'll pass. Just a couple of coppers. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Charles Ryan on Adventures
Top