Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Charms and Combat
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Shiroiken" data-source="post: 8447383" data-attributes="member: 6775477"><p>I do this with any spell cast, not just disadvantageous ones. Casting a spell in front of someone who doesn't know magic is going to be considered suspicious, and noble/royal personages are going to have guards watching carefully. I allow Dex/Deception to perform it subtly to give them a chance of success, even if it's not very good. Failing this check will almost certainly trigger initiative, just like drawing a weapon, while success allows the spell to trigger without starting a combat. </p><p></p><p>I also find the "automatically knows it was magically influenced" to be problematic. Instead, when the effect ends the target makes an Int/Arcana DC: 10+spell level (use DC if non-spell ability). If successful, the target realizes it as normal, but otherwise they mentally justify their actions. If someone points out they were manipulated, they then become aware of the manipulate, even if they failed the check in the first place.</p><p></p><p>Suggestion kinda needs this to be effective outside of combat (although it's amazing in combat). Something to be aware of though, is that the "official rulings" aren't actual rules; they're just the rulings by JC and others. I regularly ignore JC, who I feel is an idiot.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Shiroiken, post: 8447383, member: 6775477"] I do this with any spell cast, not just disadvantageous ones. Casting a spell in front of someone who doesn't know magic is going to be considered suspicious, and noble/royal personages are going to have guards watching carefully. I allow Dex/Deception to perform it subtly to give them a chance of success, even if it's not very good. Failing this check will almost certainly trigger initiative, just like drawing a weapon, while success allows the spell to trigger without starting a combat. I also find the "automatically knows it was magically influenced" to be problematic. Instead, when the effect ends the target makes an Int/Arcana DC: 10+spell level (use DC if non-spell ability). If successful, the target realizes it as normal, but otherwise they mentally justify their actions. If someone points out they were manipulated, they then become aware of the manipulate, even if they failed the check in the first place. Suggestion kinda needs this to be effective outside of combat (although it's amazing in combat). Something to be aware of though, is that the "official rulings" aren't actual rules; they're just the rulings by JC and others. I regularly ignore JC, who I feel is an idiot. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Charms and Combat
Top