Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
CharOp: Hybrid BM Ranger/Shaman, with dual MC's
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AbdulAlhazred" data-source="post: 5190694" data-attributes="member: 82106"><p>Hmmm, I guess I'm not sure how effective you are going to be with ranger powers with a 10 and a 15 in its attack stats. 15 isn't terrible but its not great. </p><p></p><p>Personally I'm not sold on the Ranger|Shaman as an effective hybrid. Rangers can benefit from wisdom and constitution isn't a bad stat for some builds but the stat synergy overall is marginal at best. If it were me I'd concentrate entirely on 2 stats. Dex and Wis would be the logical choices with maybe Con as a tertiary or possibly Int. It seems like the character is going to be pretty much 100% missile weapon/ranged power focused. I wouldn't even bother with things like Axe feats and such as melee/heavy thrown stuff is all going to rely on Str and its inadvisable for a character as squishy as a shaman hybrid to get ANYWHERE near melee.</p><p></p><p>Given that you don't have a spirit boon my feeling would be the best sort of strategy with this type character would be use your SC as a blocker (and take the at-will that lets you OA with it). Use a bow, take a flying or similar BC that can let you HQ anywhere on the battlefield and use Twin Strike liberally, then concentrate on mobility enhancing powers, stuff that debilitates enemy movement (to keep them away from you) and maybe buffs/debuffs you can combine with archery.</p><p></p><p>The OA based beast master tricks sound cool in theory but I think they're not really a good basis for building a character's combat capability around. The DM always has the choice to provoke or not and any strategy that relies on the enemy to be stupid is bound to mediocrity.</p><p></p><p>Of course I haven't seen anyone play anything close to this build, so its hard to say how accurate my estimation is. It sounds like you're not totally married to a specific build, but character concept trumps mechanics IMHO so do what will be fun. As for race I think human isn't bad. The extra at-will can be REALLY handy for a character that has so many powers to choose. Razorclaw Shifter wouldn't be a bad choice either though, mobility and ideal stat boosts...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AbdulAlhazred, post: 5190694, member: 82106"] Hmmm, I guess I'm not sure how effective you are going to be with ranger powers with a 10 and a 15 in its attack stats. 15 isn't terrible but its not great. Personally I'm not sold on the Ranger|Shaman as an effective hybrid. Rangers can benefit from wisdom and constitution isn't a bad stat for some builds but the stat synergy overall is marginal at best. If it were me I'd concentrate entirely on 2 stats. Dex and Wis would be the logical choices with maybe Con as a tertiary or possibly Int. It seems like the character is going to be pretty much 100% missile weapon/ranged power focused. I wouldn't even bother with things like Axe feats and such as melee/heavy thrown stuff is all going to rely on Str and its inadvisable for a character as squishy as a shaman hybrid to get ANYWHERE near melee. Given that you don't have a spirit boon my feeling would be the best sort of strategy with this type character would be use your SC as a blocker (and take the at-will that lets you OA with it). Use a bow, take a flying or similar BC that can let you HQ anywhere on the battlefield and use Twin Strike liberally, then concentrate on mobility enhancing powers, stuff that debilitates enemy movement (to keep them away from you) and maybe buffs/debuffs you can combine with archery. The OA based beast master tricks sound cool in theory but I think they're not really a good basis for building a character's combat capability around. The DM always has the choice to provoke or not and any strategy that relies on the enemy to be stupid is bound to mediocrity. Of course I haven't seen anyone play anything close to this build, so its hard to say how accurate my estimation is. It sounds like you're not totally married to a specific build, but character concept trumps mechanics IMHO so do what will be fun. As for race I think human isn't bad. The extra at-will can be REALLY handy for a character that has so many powers to choose. Razorclaw Shifter wouldn't be a bad choice either though, mobility and ideal stat boosts... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
CharOp: Hybrid BM Ranger/Shaman, with dual MC's
Top