Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
ChatGPT lies then gaslights reporter with fake transcript
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blue" data-source="post: 9768554" data-attributes="member: 20564"><p>You made a jump there that just isn't true. Yes, it's the tiny models that you can run at home. But just having the ability to do so at home has prompted a lot of improvements. For generative AI art it was home users who worked out LoRAs and their descendants, to add a specific training layer on top of a trained model without the costs of retraining the original model. Lots of improvements because of those limitations. Necessity is the mother of invention and all that.</p><p></p><p>They've published the costs of bulk queries, and it's not "very expensive" to do a query. Doing tens of millions of queries, especially in deep thinking mode, is a different story, but that requires tens of millions of questions asked by people.</p><p></p><p>Again, I've professionally managed both owned and co-lo datacenters for global companies. Running a single query against a trained model isn't "very expensive".</p><p></p><p></p><p>If you want to sliding into a separate discussion about the economics of the companies, fine.</p><p></p><p>Year ago, if you wanted to find a phone number you dialed 411. Back when phone calls were still a big thing. And you got charged for it. Google did a free one (1 800 GOOG 411 if I recall) that would also connect you for free. You just spoke what you wanted, it verified it, and then it would giove you the numebr and offer to connect you. It was a free service.</p><p></p><p>Did it make money? Lots. Oh, you only can see that calling a free number didn't make them anything. What they were doing was doing voice recognition training on loads of people, different accents and dialects, and getting down proper nouns correctly. It was an extremely economical way to do that, and that paid off nicely.</p><p></p><p>So if you're only looking that Open AI doesn't make money on current queries, you need to ask yourself why are they doing it? It's not altruism. There's a payoff, even if it's not a direct one.</p><p></p><p>Remember the old truism, "If something is free, you're the product".</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blue, post: 9768554, member: 20564"] You made a jump there that just isn't true. Yes, it's the tiny models that you can run at home. But just having the ability to do so at home has prompted a lot of improvements. For generative AI art it was home users who worked out LoRAs and their descendants, to add a specific training layer on top of a trained model without the costs of retraining the original model. Lots of improvements because of those limitations. Necessity is the mother of invention and all that. They've published the costs of bulk queries, and it's not "very expensive" to do a query. Doing tens of millions of queries, especially in deep thinking mode, is a different story, but that requires tens of millions of questions asked by people. Again, I've professionally managed both owned and co-lo datacenters for global companies. Running a single query against a trained model isn't "very expensive". If you want to sliding into a separate discussion about the economics of the companies, fine. Year ago, if you wanted to find a phone number you dialed 411. Back when phone calls were still a big thing. And you got charged for it. Google did a free one (1 800 GOOG 411 if I recall) that would also connect you for free. You just spoke what you wanted, it verified it, and then it would giove you the numebr and offer to connect you. It was a free service. Did it make money? Lots. Oh, you only can see that calling a free number didn't make them anything. What they were doing was doing voice recognition training on loads of people, different accents and dialects, and getting down proper nouns correctly. It was an extremely economical way to do that, and that paid off nicely. So if you're only looking that Open AI doesn't make money on current queries, you need to ask yourself why are they doing it? It's not altruism. There's a payoff, even if it's not a direct one. Remember the old truism, "If something is free, you're the product". [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
ChatGPT lies then gaslights reporter with fake transcript
Top