Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 9772304" data-attributes="member: 42856">Nice to know. So, one of the great point of image-generating AI is that it is doing good for the commissionned art market. I'll quote you on that in the future. I'm glad for artists that all the naysayers about AI taking jobs were wrong. I still feel job replacement will happen at some point, but I am glad it isn't happening yet for them as I understand that my views about a society freeed from the buden of having to work being an utopia isn't shared by all. It is logical that a segmentation of the market between those satisfied with AI offering (a certain combination of quality, price, and quickness of execution) wouldn't be on the market for having a human-made illustration matching this offering. By satisfying the need of a lot of customers, those that you call "low quality and stingy" because insulting AI consumers is certainly adding to the smartness of your post and lending credence to your argument, it made easier for the demand for non-AI offering to meet the offer in a less than ideal market.</blockquote>