Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
ChatGPT lies then gaslights reporter with fake transcript
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jfdlsjfd" data-source="post: 9772318" data-attributes="member: 42856"><p>It's a video saying, with a lot of emphasis and storytelling, how the reporter discovered that AI hallucinations are a thing, proceed to illustrate it to its co-host who seem to discover warm water as well as him, leading to the conclusion that it will change our lives and workplace but we need to be careful, accompanied by a commentary saying : "AI slop do exist, this is one of the examples".</p><p></p><p>This isn't a thread about the evil of AI in general: it ends with the reporter implying he'll keep using it (possibly more carefully than before and maybe he'll be educating himself on how to use the tool to lessen occurences of AI errors -- one he had obviously no trouble detecting and correcting despite his professed total ignorance of the topic). A video about the evil of AI would end with a warning like: "do not use it". I agree that the storytelling about the information is certainly pointing to a message like "look, AI is baaaaad" in a click-baity way, but that's reporting nowadays.</p><p></p><p>The accompanying commentary "here is a single example of AI slop" proves that AI hallucinations exist, which is probably denied by noone. It isn't implying this is a (-) thread on AI, but a discussion about AI hallucinations, in which an opinion like "sure they exist, but their prevalence is uncommon enough given adequate precaution that AI is still making a significant value offering for specific uses" sounds perfectly adequate.</p><p></p><p>If I were posting an illustration of using a skill challenge in my D&D game where it went badly, and concluding that skill challenge is certainly a part of the popular rules but it's not great all the time, wouldn't you think that someone saying "my experience with skill challenge is overall better than yours and despite the flaw you experimented, it's nonetheless a good mechanics" on topic?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jfdlsjfd, post: 9772318, member: 42856"] It's a video saying, with a lot of emphasis and storytelling, how the reporter discovered that AI hallucinations are a thing, proceed to illustrate it to its co-host who seem to discover warm water as well as him, leading to the conclusion that it will change our lives and workplace but we need to be careful, accompanied by a commentary saying : "AI slop do exist, this is one of the examples". This isn't a thread about the evil of AI in general: it ends with the reporter implying he'll keep using it (possibly more carefully than before and maybe he'll be educating himself on how to use the tool to lessen occurences of AI errors -- one he had obviously no trouble detecting and correcting despite his professed total ignorance of the topic). A video about the evil of AI would end with a warning like: "do not use it". I agree that the storytelling about the information is certainly pointing to a message like "look, AI is baaaaad" in a click-baity way, but that's reporting nowadays. The accompanying commentary "here is a single example of AI slop" proves that AI hallucinations exist, which is probably denied by noone. It isn't implying this is a (-) thread on AI, but a discussion about AI hallucinations, in which an opinion like "sure they exist, but their prevalence is uncommon enough given adequate precaution that AI is still making a significant value offering for specific uses" sounds perfectly adequate. If I were posting an illustration of using a skill challenge in my D&D game where it went badly, and concluding that skill challenge is certainly a part of the popular rules but it's not great all the time, wouldn't you think that someone saying "my experience with skill challenge is overall better than yours and despite the flaw you experimented, it's nonetheless a good mechanics" on topic? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
ChatGPT lies then gaslights reporter with fake transcript
Top