Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="iwatt" data-source="post: 2816120" data-attributes="member: 11085">Thx swrushing, I thought I was alone here.  <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink    ;)"  data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> I think you and I share the same position here.  By the way I don't see this direct connection between trust and friendship. I can be a friend with someone I don't completely trust. Because truth be told, you can never be sure about somebody. I choose my friends based on a simple criteria: are they fun to be around. Maybe this difference explains my tolerance? If some friend lies to me, I won't trust them anymore. doesn't mean I'll stop been friends with him. I'll also give him the chance to regain my trust.Jim Hague: I thought I'd been clear in my early posts: I'm not defending cheating that breaks the game. I'm not defending cheating to hog the limelight. I'm defending those small little cheating things like:The player has had a paticular long run of bad rolls, and he misses the target AC by 1 or 2 points. Fudge is OK. Action points definitively help her, and that's why I recently introduced them. there's nothing lamer than a kickass fighter who can't kick some ass.The PC is part of a long campaign, and during a non-pivotal battle the DM rolled two critical hits in a row, his character goes from full hitpoints to -11. If the player fudges and marks down -9hp, it's alright by me.</blockquote>

Verification