Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="haakon1" data-source="post: 9389855" data-attributes="member: 25619">Yes, I have all that too. I’ve used Marklands for Furyondy, with substantial modifications, like no Flare Line.I do have Wars in my now 589 CY campaigns, but not FtA’s Wars.<ul> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Bissel was invaded but did not fall, in “The War of the Lanthorn” caused by PC’s doing the Lost Caverns of Tsojcanth.  Bissel won due to the huge standing army - Border Companies - mentioned in 576 CY sources.  And PC actions.  And support from Veluna because the Giant Troubles went differently.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">The Giant Troubles conquered Sterich, but not Geoff or the Yeomanry.  Why?  Because PC’s succeeded in G123D123Q1.  Lolth is dead.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Tenh is a quagmire - a 4 way war.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Iuz did attack everyone.  The Great Northern Crusade of Furyondy with Veluna, the Shield Lands, Highfolk, and the Vesve is a major war. Independently and sometimes in coordination, the Wolf Nomads, and survivors from the Rovers of the Barrens, Horned Society, and Bandit Kingdoms are all counterattacking as well.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Hold of Sea Princes is nominally conquered by the Scarlet Brotherhood, but Westkeep is held by Keoland, Berghof never fell, and most of the interior has been captured by a slave revolt or Sea Princes deadenders.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">“Ivid’s War” went roughly as Living Greyhawk Gazetteer tells it, with the same results.  My players weren’t there, so it doesn’t much matter.</li> <li data-xf-list-type="ul">Definitely no peace of Greyhawk!</li> </ul>The end result is plenty of room for adventure and war, I think close to what Gygax intended.</blockquote>

Verification