Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Steve_MND" data-source="post: 6826858" data-attributes="member: 6801314">I'm not saying that they can't -- or even shouldn't -- "change things up."  I'm just saying that there are a few (a precious few, but a few nonetheless) elements that you SHOULD NOT change if you are trying to run something as an OP-style campaign, because if you do, then it is no longer an OP-style campaign, but something else.I feel that setting up a situation like this -- based not on in-character or in-game actions but rather the bureaucratic structure of a participatory story arc -- is a poor choice and not ultimately in the best interests of the campaign.  Just a personal opinion, of course, but one that I feel very strongly about, and will continue to argue against when and if the discussion comes up.If they continue to make certain changes like this, I am starting to think that a complete restructuring of the concept of the "Adventurer's League" may be worthwhile, as it is slowly morphing away from the traditional Organized Play framework that they advertise it as.  I know it was announced recently about some new terminology coming up shortly, so maybe we'll see what happens at that point.</blockquote>