Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Chess is not an RPG: The Illusion of Game Balance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bedrockgames" data-source="post: 6405622" data-attributes="member: 85555"><p>not all people who do 4d6 drop the lowest do two sets though. Lots of people do one set and only eliminate characters they consider hopeless. We have been covering a lot of ground here dealing with many different takes on the method. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Again, not all groups do this. And two, the normal procedure is for people to agree on a single method and have all players use that, so it isn't like you would have one player doing this to get an advantage for himself over the other players. </p><p></p><p>But ultimately I think it is a bit odd to question peoples' motives here. That whole business over the pizza, is a mentality I just do not understand. First, we know they like 4d6 drop the lowest. Maybe they are more or less insightful over their own motives, I don't really care if they are or not. The key thing is folks do know what they like, so attacking the reasons they provide for them, really just seems like a sneaky way of getting them to take your method rather than the one they prefer. Like I said, I prefer 3d6, not 4d6. Yet it doesn't bother me that people want 4d6 and say they want it because it gives them that spark of random, a bit of excitement and a little cushion against weaker characters. Seems reasonable to me and I will happily adopt this method if that is what the group as a whole wants.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bedrockgames, post: 6405622, member: 85555"] not all people who do 4d6 drop the lowest do two sets though. Lots of people do one set and only eliminate characters they consider hopeless. We have been covering a lot of ground here dealing with many different takes on the method. Again, not all groups do this. And two, the normal procedure is for people to agree on a single method and have all players use that, so it isn't like you would have one player doing this to get an advantage for himself over the other players. But ultimately I think it is a bit odd to question peoples' motives here. That whole business over the pizza, is a mentality I just do not understand. First, we know they like 4d6 drop the lowest. Maybe they are more or less insightful over their own motives, I don't really care if they are or not. The key thing is folks do know what they like, so attacking the reasons they provide for them, really just seems like a sneaky way of getting them to take your method rather than the one they prefer. Like I said, I prefer 3d6, not 4d6. Yet it doesn't bother me that people want 4d6 and say they want it because it gives them that spark of random, a bit of excitement and a little cushion against weaker characters. Seems reasonable to me and I will happily adopt this method if that is what the group as a whole wants. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Chess is not an RPG: The Illusion of Game Balance
Top