Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Chess is not an RPG: The Illusion of Game Balance
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Bedrockgames" data-source="post: 6415681" data-attributes="member: 85555"><p>I am not suggesting that any attempt to define is rooted in this. I think there are plenty of good reasons to have a working definition of something (even if only to label it for consumers so they can get what they want). In this respect terms like OSR, Story Game, Genre, etc can all be very useful. I think where it is a problem is when people use highly proscriptive definitions and it is clear their definition also just happens to align with their preferred style of play and exclude styles they dislike. Things I generally look for is how is the person arriving at their definition. If they take the OSR and simply try to describe what they see it including, that is fine. No problem. It is when someone starts playing games with root words or tries to reduce to come up with a definition that is obviously meant to exclude certain players, that I have an issue. This is something we see a lot of in gaming discussions and posters often don't realize what is going on so they fall into the trap of accepting a flawed definition and then trying to fit their position within it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Bedrockgames, post: 6415681, member: 85555"] I am not suggesting that any attempt to define is rooted in this. I think there are plenty of good reasons to have a working definition of something (even if only to label it for consumers so they can get what they want). In this respect terms like OSR, Story Game, Genre, etc can all be very useful. I think where it is a problem is when people use highly proscriptive definitions and it is clear their definition also just happens to align with their preferred style of play and exclude styles they dislike. Things I generally look for is how is the person arriving at their definition. If they take the OSR and simply try to describe what they see it including, that is fine. No problem. It is when someone starts playing games with root words or tries to reduce to come up with a definition that is obviously meant to exclude certain players, that I have an issue. This is something we see a lot of in gaming discussions and posters often don't realize what is going on so they fall into the trap of accepting a flawed definition and then trying to fit their position within it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Chess is not an RPG: The Illusion of Game Balance
Top