Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ninjacat" data-source="post: 4486183" data-attributes="member: 24418">Well, I'm afraid it's closer to first-pass than ashcan. There's quite a bit of the system done (it's relatively simple) but a LOT of it is still in various notebooks, files, some still in my head, etc. The Players' portion is mostly done, and I expect I could have it 99% finished by GameDay, which is why I'd be interested in seeing people's thoughts on playing it, but much of the GM stuff is still in my head or random notes, needs compiling, that kind of thing. I guess this would be an &quot;alpha&quot; playtest, still requiring the creator to run it, as opposed to a &quot;beta&quot; of turning a group loose to see what they can do with it?But yeah, you were one of the people I thought might be interested. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink&nbsp; &nbsp; ;)"&nbsp; data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /> Does a mostly-complete Players' Section sound like enough to hold your interest?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ninjacat, post: 4486183, member: 24418"] Well, I'm afraid it's closer to first-pass than ashcan. There's quite a bit of the system done (it's relatively simple) but a LOT of it is still in various notebooks, files, some still in my head, etc. The Players' portion is mostly done, and I expect I could have it 99% finished by GameDay, which is why I'd be interested in seeing people's thoughts on playing it, but much of the GM stuff is still in my head or random notes, needs compiling, that kind of thing. I guess this would be an "alpha" playtest, still requiring the creator to run it, as opposed to a "beta" of turning a group loose to see what they can do with it? But yeah, you were one of the people I thought might be interested. ;) Does a mostly-complete Players' Section sound like enough to hold your interest? [/QUOTE]

Verification