Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- Pocket Sized Adventures! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed for 1-2 game sessions.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Chill Touch Poll
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FireLance" data-source="post: 2629067" data-attributes="member: 3424"><p>Of course, I interpret the instantaneous effect to be the effect of the touch: 1d6 points of negative energy damage and 1 point of Strength damage (Fort save negates) for living creatures. To be absolutely exact, the Duration entry should read "Instantaneous or 1d4 rounds plus 1 round/level", since undead creatures touched flee as if panicked for 1d4 round + 1 round per caster level (Will save negates). Incidentally, this is what the Saving Throw entry of "Fortitude partial or Will negates; see text" refers to. Furthermore, the Range entry of the spell is "Touch" and not "Personal", and the Target entry of the spell is "Creature or creatures touched", not "You".</p><p></p><p>If it wasn't for the clause of one touch per caster level, I don't think there would be any argument that <em>chill touch</em> instantaneously grants the caster the ability to make one touch attack per level. Take a look at <em>shocking grasp</em>. The Range, Target and Duration entries are practically identical. Would you make the same argument there?</p><p></p><p>For a 1st-level caster (when it affects a single target creature), <em>chill touch</em> should work like <em>shocking grasp</em>. The spell has its instantaneous effect (if the caster touches a living creature) and ends. For a 2nd-level caster, it should work exactly the same way, except that he can make one more touch attack after he has made the first. And so on, at higher caster levels.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FireLance, post: 2629067, member: 3424"] Of course, I interpret the instantaneous effect to be the effect of the touch: 1d6 points of negative energy damage and 1 point of Strength damage (Fort save negates) for living creatures. To be absolutely exact, the Duration entry should read "Instantaneous or 1d4 rounds plus 1 round/level", since undead creatures touched flee as if panicked for 1d4 round + 1 round per caster level (Will save negates). Incidentally, this is what the Saving Throw entry of "Fortitude partial or Will negates; see text" refers to. Furthermore, the Range entry of the spell is "Touch" and not "Personal", and the Target entry of the spell is "Creature or creatures touched", not "You". If it wasn't for the clause of one touch per caster level, I don't think there would be any argument that [I]chill touch[/I] instantaneously grants the caster the ability to make one touch attack per level. Take a look at [I]shocking grasp[/I]. The Range, Target and Duration entries are practically identical. Would you make the same argument there? For a 1st-level caster (when it affects a single target creature), [I]chill touch[/I] should work like [I]shocking grasp[/I]. The spell has its instantaneous effect (if the caster touches a living creature) and ends. For a 2nd-level caster, it should work exactly the same way, except that he can make one more touch attack after he has made the first. And so on, at higher caster levels. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Chill Touch Poll
Top