Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
China Mieville on Tolkien and Epic/High Fantasy
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="takyris" data-source="post: 1209904" data-attributes="member: 5171"><p>This argument gets kicked around a lot on writing websites. My personal opinion is that most writers arguing about it should shut up and write, and most readers are not going to convinced of one thing or the other.</p><p></p><p>I've read plenty of Science Fiction that wasn't idea fiction, to the point where I could with some internal justification call it "The Literature of Tropes" rather than the literature of ideas -- almost every issue of Asimov's SF and the Magazine of FSF has yet another story that uses quantum physics in some overly cute way, yet another future-slice-of-life story that uses Internet extrapolation and wearable computer research to spice up a "Divorce in the Hamptons" story, and yet another been-there-done-that-idea story by a writer who is famous enough to look good on the cover. This isn't a dig at those magazines -- they only publish it because people want to read it.</p><p></p><p>By the same token, saying that Fantasy is the literature of characters is unsupportable. You could say the same thing about Romance novels. They both use archetypes rather than actual characters most of the time. You can't throw a rock in the fantasy section of Borders without hitting an oft-scorned scullery lad who is castigated for having 21st-century ethics in a Middle Ages setting, as well as a birthmark shaped like a phoenix holding a crown in one claw and a flaming sword in the other, who then goes on to save the world six times from progressively more horned-and-scaly manifestations of that guy who bullied the author back in middle school -- or the orphan girl who is amazingly beautiful but odd in some way that causes all the locals to call her ugly until some incredibly handsome (and also possessed of 21st-century ethics despite living in the Middle Ages and being tutored and raised by people with Middle Ages ethics) young man in a position of power falls for her and realizes that her gift of using song/poetry/dancing/weaving to control/predict/talk to/feel the emotions of the savage and untamed dragons/whales/rainbows/unicorns/star-magic-people is precious and wonderful, and then he makes her into a princess, and everyone is happy.</p><p></p><p>EDIT: And there are exceptions in every genre. There are really original SF novels and amazingly real Fantasy novels -- and really funny and realistic and enjoyable Romance novels, too. So what we've established is that some people have generalizations one way, some people have generalizations the other way, and there are exceptions to all generalizations. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>So, really, writing is writing. Genre is only useful in helping you find what you like. Using it for sweeping philosophical judgements is great for starting arguments and not much else.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="takyris, post: 1209904, member: 5171"] This argument gets kicked around a lot on writing websites. My personal opinion is that most writers arguing about it should shut up and write, and most readers are not going to convinced of one thing or the other. I've read plenty of Science Fiction that wasn't idea fiction, to the point where I could with some internal justification call it "The Literature of Tropes" rather than the literature of ideas -- almost every issue of Asimov's SF and the Magazine of FSF has yet another story that uses quantum physics in some overly cute way, yet another future-slice-of-life story that uses Internet extrapolation and wearable computer research to spice up a "Divorce in the Hamptons" story, and yet another been-there-done-that-idea story by a writer who is famous enough to look good on the cover. This isn't a dig at those magazines -- they only publish it because people want to read it. By the same token, saying that Fantasy is the literature of characters is unsupportable. You could say the same thing about Romance novels. They both use archetypes rather than actual characters most of the time. You can't throw a rock in the fantasy section of Borders without hitting an oft-scorned scullery lad who is castigated for having 21st-century ethics in a Middle Ages setting, as well as a birthmark shaped like a phoenix holding a crown in one claw and a flaming sword in the other, who then goes on to save the world six times from progressively more horned-and-scaly manifestations of that guy who bullied the author back in middle school -- or the orphan girl who is amazingly beautiful but odd in some way that causes all the locals to call her ugly until some incredibly handsome (and also possessed of 21st-century ethics despite living in the Middle Ages and being tutored and raised by people with Middle Ages ethics) young man in a position of power falls for her and realizes that her gift of using song/poetry/dancing/weaving to control/predict/talk to/feel the emotions of the savage and untamed dragons/whales/rainbows/unicorns/star-magic-people is precious and wonderful, and then he makes her into a princess, and everyone is happy. EDIT: And there are exceptions in every genre. There are really original SF novels and amazingly real Fantasy novels -- and really funny and realistic and enjoyable Romance novels, too. So what we've established is that some people have generalizations one way, some people have generalizations the other way, and there are exceptions to all generalizations. :) So, really, writing is writing. Genre is only useful in helping you find what you like. Using it for sweeping philosophical judgements is great for starting arguments and not much else. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Geek Talk & Media
China Mieville on Tolkien and Epic/High Fantasy
Top