Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Lyxen" data-source="post: 8536515" data-attributes="member: 7032025">Went below PF... Nothing more to say.That is so extremely minor, so far, it is declared to be backwards compatible, so certainly not 6e, and changes are really small.And then you do seem to care very much since YOU labelled it 6e. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />Actually, I like suggestions based on any edition, and those from 4e are actually often good, there were a number of good things there. But it has NOTHING to do with the fact that the edition was a fiasco, which is a simple absolute truth.Just look at the stats and the dates that you yourself provided.You are inventing numbers. This only happens in your imagination.Simply for the fact that D&amp;D's supremacy was never contested except during 4e, where it fell down. How hard is this to understand. And I don't have the figures year per year, however, today, for example the Roll20 stats show D&amp;D alone at more than 50% and the best second is not even pathfinder, it's CoC at 11%...You are getting exactly what you asked for trying to prove, despite all numbers showing the contrary, that 4e was popular. Drop it, it was not.However, please continue providing great ideas, from 4e or elsewhere, ideas are good whatever the source.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Lyxen, post: 8536515, member: 7032025"] Went below PF... Nothing more to say. That is so extremely minor, so far, it is declared to be backwards compatible, so certainly not 6e, and changes are really small. And then you do seem to care very much since YOU labelled it 6e. :p Actually, I like suggestions based on any edition, and those from 4e are actually often good, there were a number of good things there. But it has NOTHING to do with the fact that the edition was a fiasco, which is a simple absolute truth. Just look at the stats and the dates that you yourself provided. You are inventing numbers. This only happens in your imagination. Simply for the fact that D&D's supremacy was never contested except during 4e, where it fell down. How hard is this to understand. And I don't have the figures year per year, however, today, for example the Roll20 stats show D&D alone at more than 50% and the best second is not even pathfinder, it's CoC at 11%... You are getting exactly what you asked for trying to prove, despite all numbers showing the contrary, that 4e was popular. Drop it, it was not. However, please continue providing great ideas, from 4e or elsewhere, ideas are good whatever the source. [/QUOTE]

Verification