Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Chris just said why I hate wizard/fighter dynamic
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jaeger" data-source="post: 8540016" data-attributes="member: 27996"><p>These two go together:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Many people decided that they did not like <em>the particular way</em> 4e addressed the issue of LFQW. </p><p></p><p>Evidently 4e's designers wanted to do things a bit differently, but such is the way that cookie crumbled.</p><p></p><p>Yes, there is a lot of untrue anti-4e nonsense out there.</p><p></p><p>But 4e fans need to realize that there are also <em>a whole lot</em> of D&D players that <em>legitimately just don't like</em> the overall design direction of how 4e did things.</p><p></p><p>It is what it is.</p><p></p><p></p><p>These two go together as well:</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Since 3e WotC has gradually gotten rid of many of the checks that there used to be on casters power without really addressing the spell lists to compensate.</p><p></p><p>Fewer spells at early levels. Fewer spells known overall.</p><p>Learning spells was a roll. Spells found was GM/campaign fiat. Same with what spells were available to learn and when.</p><p>TSR D&D had segment casting times, interruption during combat was more of a thing.</p><p>And spell components were actually supposed to be a thing...</p><p></p><p>All of that is <em>gone</em>.</p><p></p><p>Yes Charm and sleep have kinda been nerfed... But that has more to do with players complaining abut those spells being used on them! Not with addressing LFQW.</p><p></p><p>For all of its influences on popular media the one thing from D&D that has never made the translation was hardcore vancian magic. Players want to be spell slingers, not "one trick ponies". </p><p></p><p>Over the past few editions WotC has catered to those desires. And it has created a situation where they will have a hard time addressing the real root of the problem: <em>The Spell List.</em></p><p></p><p>To really address LFQW - the Spell List needs to be gone over with a fine toothed comb and be redesigned from the ground up. Specifically taking into account that the checks previously imposed on magic users are not there anymore.</p><p></p><p>This will not happen. Ever.</p><p></p><p>Never ever?</p><p></p><p>Never ever.</p><p></p><p>Why? Because "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEMMMMMYYYYWWWIIZZAARRRDDDDHHAASSBBEENN NERFED!!!" "DEATH TO WOTC!!"</p><p></p><p>WotC just doesn't want to hear it. The overwhelming majority of games never go past 10th level, and most other groups seem to just more or less make it work.</p><p></p><p>It's seen as not worth the headache that they'd get from that part of the fanbase to fix what should have been addressed with 3e. Especially considering that <em>in my opinion;</em> some of the D&D devs <em>are</em> part of the fanbase that like magic users just how they are, thank you very much...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jaeger, post: 8540016, member: 27996"] These two go together: Many people decided that they did not like [I]the particular way[/I] 4e addressed the issue of LFQW. Evidently 4e's designers wanted to do things a bit differently, but such is the way that cookie crumbled. Yes, there is a lot of untrue anti-4e nonsense out there. But 4e fans need to realize that there are also [I]a whole lot[/I] of D&D players that [I]legitimately just don't like[/I] the overall design direction of how 4e did things. It is what it is. These two go together as well: Since 3e WotC has gradually gotten rid of many of the checks that there used to be on casters power without really addressing the spell lists to compensate. Fewer spells at early levels. Fewer spells known overall. Learning spells was a roll. Spells found was GM/campaign fiat. Same with what spells were available to learn and when. TSR D&D had segment casting times, interruption during combat was more of a thing. And spell components were actually supposed to be a thing... All of that is [I]gone[/I]. Yes Charm and sleep have kinda been nerfed... But that has more to do with players complaining abut those spells being used on them! Not with addressing LFQW. For all of its influences on popular media the one thing from D&D that has never made the translation was hardcore vancian magic. Players want to be spell slingers, not "one trick ponies". Over the past few editions WotC has catered to those desires. And it has created a situation where they will have a hard time addressing the real root of the problem: [I]The Spell List.[/I] To really address LFQW - the Spell List needs to be gone over with a fine toothed comb and be redesigned from the ground up. Specifically taking into account that the checks previously imposed on magic users are not there anymore. This will not happen. Ever. Never ever? Never ever. Why? Because "REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEMMMMMYYYYWWWIIZZAARRRDDDDHHAASSBBEENN NERFED!!!" "DEATH TO WOTC!!" WotC just doesn't want to hear it. The overwhelming majority of games never go past 10th level, and most other groups seem to just more or less make it work. It's seen as not worth the headache that they'd get from that part of the fanbase to fix what should have been addressed with 3e. Especially considering that [I]in my opinion;[/I] some of the D&D devs [I]are[/I] part of the fanbase that like magic users just how they are, thank you very much... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Chris just said why I hate wizard/fighter dynamic
Top