Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Snarf Zagyg" data-source="post: 9492906" data-attributes="member: 7023840">Agreed. I think the best way to do it (other than doing the gritty version, which moves short rests to a day and long to a week, which presents its own issues) is this-1. Reduce the time needed. You can't do it immediately, or in combat, or in the few minutes between waves of aggro'd monsters. But 10 minutes? Sure.2. Cap the short rests. 2 per day (long rest). No more, and given it's faster and easier and under more player control, they will likely get them. I think if you just had those changes, you could allow short rest-dependent classes to do their own resource management and get rid of the issue. As I noted, it's just really annoying that the game is designed with a few classes having a different resource &quot;timer&quot; than other classes. Personally, I think it's great to have that difference, but it's annoying because of the implementation.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Snarf Zagyg, post: 9492906, member: 7023840"] Agreed. I think the best way to do it (other than doing the gritty version, which moves short rests to a day and long to a week, which presents its own issues) is this- 1. Reduce the time needed. You can't do it immediately, or in combat, or in the few minutes between waves of aggro'd monsters. But 10 minutes? Sure. 2. Cap the short rests. 2 per day (long rest). No more, and given it's faster and easier and under more player control, they will likely get them. I think if you just had those changes, you could allow short rest-dependent classes to do their own resource management and get rid of the issue. As I noted, it's just really annoying that the game is designed with a few classes having a different resource "timer" than other classes. Personally, I think it's great to have that difference, but it's annoying because of the implementation. [/QUOTE]

Verification