Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Chris Perkins: Reintroducing Settings in Ways that Surprise People
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="timbannock" data-source="post: 7666488" data-attributes="member: 17913"><p>This position makes sense to me; thank you for explaining!</p><p></p><p>And not to poo-poo that position at all -- it's entirely valid, nay, inescapable for some amount of the existing (and thus realistically largest) part of the audience to feel this way -- but I think FR specifically, and most of the classic D&D campaign settings in general, are pretty much as complete a product line as they can realistically be without drilling down so deep into the niche that it's just completely vanity press, fan-support style material. Maybe I'm wrong -- hopefully I am! -- but with dndclassics.com and other sources of obtaining older edition material, Wizards probably realizes that there's no sustainable way to keep saying "new" things about any given setting, so appeal to the widest audience possible to make thrilling, useful-at-the-game table scenarios.</p><p></p><p>I think Wizards is effectively done catering to the audience that wants every inch of land detailed, every member of every organization statted out, etc. etc. They want a game that gets played, because that brings in a bigger *potential* group of consumers over time, even if it necessarily kills off some of the rabid-fanbase side of their consumers. By "rabid" I mean the collectors and readers of RPG books, as opposed to the people actively playing the game. Sure there's lots of overlap there, but I for one am a fan of the reading and collecting, but am perfectly happy also not being one of those people if they aren't catering to that, so they've targeted me (an edge case) plus anyone seeking published material to plunder (DUNGEON readers, FR gamers, Adventurer League gamers, people-willing-to-do-the-porting-to-whatever-their-campaign-is gamers) which is likely a bigger group. True, they may not be as diehardly consistent a buying group...but with the publishing schedule Wizards seems to be sticking to, that's not really a problem at all.</p><p></p><p>Just my thoughts, not really a position on whether this is good or bad for the future.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="timbannock, post: 7666488, member: 17913"] This position makes sense to me; thank you for explaining! And not to poo-poo that position at all -- it's entirely valid, nay, inescapable for some amount of the existing (and thus realistically largest) part of the audience to feel this way -- but I think FR specifically, and most of the classic D&D campaign settings in general, are pretty much as complete a product line as they can realistically be without drilling down so deep into the niche that it's just completely vanity press, fan-support style material. Maybe I'm wrong -- hopefully I am! -- but with dndclassics.com and other sources of obtaining older edition material, Wizards probably realizes that there's no sustainable way to keep saying "new" things about any given setting, so appeal to the widest audience possible to make thrilling, useful-at-the-game table scenarios. I think Wizards is effectively done catering to the audience that wants every inch of land detailed, every member of every organization statted out, etc. etc. They want a game that gets played, because that brings in a bigger *potential* group of consumers over time, even if it necessarily kills off some of the rabid-fanbase side of their consumers. By "rabid" I mean the collectors and readers of RPG books, as opposed to the people actively playing the game. Sure there's lots of overlap there, but I for one am a fan of the reading and collecting, but am perfectly happy also not being one of those people if they aren't catering to that, so they've targeted me (an edge case) plus anyone seeking published material to plunder (DUNGEON readers, FR gamers, Adventurer League gamers, people-willing-to-do-the-porting-to-whatever-their-campaign-is gamers) which is likely a bigger group. True, they may not be as diehardly consistent a buying group...but with the publishing schedule Wizards seems to be sticking to, that's not really a problem at all. Just my thoughts, not really a position on whether this is good or bad for the future. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Chris Perkins: Reintroducing Settings in Ways that Surprise People
Top