Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Chronicles of Eberron Is Keith Baker's New D&D Book, out now!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 8840006" data-attributes="member: 7006"><p>I am not familiar with this statement or where/who it might have been made... but I don't doubt someone could have made it. I personally suspect that Tharashk originally was made to encompass Humans in addition to Half-Orcs in 3.5 because Orcs themselves were not considered a "playable race" as such at the time, and the writers might have thought the House wouldn't get enough play if it was Half-Orc alone. So giving it to Half-Orcs and Humans (and some Orcs NPCs) made sure the mark and the House would gain a bit of traction. Thus once that was established it would make sense someone would try to justify the "dual race" marking by suggesting the idea that the "Humans" were just Half-Orcs from enough generations back.</p><p></p><p>The funny part of course being that we don't have a similar "dual race" mark for either of the two half-elf Houses. Because half-elves were always more popular than half-orcs in the playerbase, the need to "boost" their playing numbers by saying Medani and Lyrandar could have humans and/or elves also with those marks was unnecessary (and in fact the setting tried to get across the idea that at this point "half-elves" were in fact a true-breeding race called Khoravar.) It doesn't make a whole lot of in-world sense to me why one of the half-races has both "parent races" as part of their ability to have a mark... and yet the other one doesn't. And it gets into the whole thing about trying to demarcate these specific two half-races as the only "real ones" in the game (via mechanics and special write-ups) with all the other potential interracial relationships being just swept under the rug as "Well, they are more connected to X or Y parent race, but we aren't going to bother really dealing with it."</p><p></p><p>At this point in the game (and within Eberron especially, as they are a setting where so-called "racial purity" is a major driving force in a predominant part of the world)... I personally would want to go either way fully on the idea of interracial parenting-- either make every parental combination of race as highlighted and explicit as half-elves and half-orcs are... or else move half-elves and half-orcs into the sub-race category like OneD&D did in their first playtest packet. Because this "<strong>these</strong> two half-races are important enough to write about but every other one isn't"... kinda blows in my opinion.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 8840006, member: 7006"] I am not familiar with this statement or where/who it might have been made... but I don't doubt someone could have made it. I personally suspect that Tharashk originally was made to encompass Humans in addition to Half-Orcs in 3.5 because Orcs themselves were not considered a "playable race" as such at the time, and the writers might have thought the House wouldn't get enough play if it was Half-Orc alone. So giving it to Half-Orcs and Humans (and some Orcs NPCs) made sure the mark and the House would gain a bit of traction. Thus once that was established it would make sense someone would try to justify the "dual race" marking by suggesting the idea that the "Humans" were just Half-Orcs from enough generations back. The funny part of course being that we don't have a similar "dual race" mark for either of the two half-elf Houses. Because half-elves were always more popular than half-orcs in the playerbase, the need to "boost" their playing numbers by saying Medani and Lyrandar could have humans and/or elves also with those marks was unnecessary (and in fact the setting tried to get across the idea that at this point "half-elves" were in fact a true-breeding race called Khoravar.) It doesn't make a whole lot of in-world sense to me why one of the half-races has both "parent races" as part of their ability to have a mark... and yet the other one doesn't. And it gets into the whole thing about trying to demarcate these specific two half-races as the only "real ones" in the game (via mechanics and special write-ups) with all the other potential interracial relationships being just swept under the rug as "Well, they are more connected to X or Y parent race, but we aren't going to bother really dealing with it." At this point in the game (and within Eberron especially, as they are a setting where so-called "racial purity" is a major driving force in a predominant part of the world)... I personally would want to go either way fully on the idea of interracial parenting-- either make every parental combination of race as highlighted and explicit as half-elves and half-orcs are... or else move half-elves and half-orcs into the sub-race category like OneD&D did in their first playtest packet. Because this "[B]these[/B] two half-races are important enough to write about but every other one isn't"... kinda blows in my opinion. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Chronicles of Eberron Is Keith Baker's New D&D Book, out now!
Top