Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Saeviomagy" data-source="post: 446394" data-attributes="member: 5890">Well, actually given how the feat is originally written, and how other feats within the PHB are written (namely rapid shot), my point of view is that this feat (and also dirty fighting) were originally intended to apply to each and every attack made during a full-round action.Otherwise both feats are complete cack.At some point, someone complained, and the feats were changed.My point of view is that the feats are NOT that powerful that they need to be nerfed in the way they were.I'd suggest that if you ARE going to make a whirlwind kick a full-round action, then you should allow any successful attack generated from use of the feat to allow a further attack. If you are going to go with the (in my opinion) more sensible house rule that both this feat and dirty fighting are allowed as extras, over and above standard attacks, then you probably only want to allow attacks to be generated from normal attacks.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Saeviomagy, post: 446394, member: 5890"] Well, actually given how the feat is originally written, and how other feats within the PHB are written (namely rapid shot), my point of view is that this feat (and also dirty fighting) were originally intended to apply to each and every attack made during a full-round action. Otherwise both feats are complete cack. At some point, someone complained, and the feats were changed. My point of view is that the feats are NOT that powerful that they need to be nerfed in the way they were. I'd suggest that if you ARE going to make a whirlwind kick a full-round action, then you should allow any successful attack generated from use of the feat to allow a further attack. If you are going to go with the (in my opinion) more sensible house rule that both this feat and dirty fighting are allowed as extras, over and above standard attacks, then you probably only want to allow attacks to be generated from normal attacks. [/QUOTE]

Verification