Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Dlsharrock" data-source="post: 4220596" data-attributes="member: 55833">[SBLOCK=tidied up OOC about interrogation rolls]My own preference is also for the movie version (I like that descriptive) and Binder's reasoning mirrors my own. Given the turn rate and the fact this is a forum game, I think it could shave weeks off the campaign and, as I already professed in the OOC thread, I'm keen to get the game moving away from the camp and into the setting. There also seems to be some indication that folks would like to do the roleplay version with rolls. This, I feel, would be better represented by the rollplay version wherein rolls are very clearly defined per series of questions/answers and we can then extrapolate a 'story' version of events based on the outcome, essentially the same thing but quicker. And if additional different-skill rolls are requested we can work them in.I also think the rollplay version will extract more information and provide greater entertainment, but really that remains to be seen <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile    :)"  data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" />Currently I have a definite roleplay preference for renau1g and Necro. What looks like a sort of roleplay leaning neutral for Shay, a definite neutral for Redclaw and a definite roll-play preference for myself and Binder. Shay and Redclaw, then, can I be a pain in the flaming eye and ask for a vote one way or another. Sorry to deny neutrality, but at present it's a stalemate.[/SBLOCK]On another note, I've not heard a Dickens from Fenris (emailed and posted his character in the OOC thread) so it looks like he's dropped out.</blockquote>

Verification