Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Hardhead" data-source="post: 745487" data-attributes="member: 2844">Actually, they're both very similar.I see nothing in the rules that says you can't store a sharp weapon in there.  Putting it in the Haversack puts it in an extradimensonal space, like a Bag of Holding, so a sharp weapon won't rupture the Haversack any more than caltrops will rupture a Bag of Holding.As for the idea that storing still requires a MEA, that's true, but the important thing is retrieving, generally.  Most of the time, you can just drop an item you don't want as a free action, and retrieve something else.  As for the idea that the stasis thing would be unbalanced, I can't really think of anything that'd make it seem too powerful.  Yeah, you could get some nice beenies from it, but that's the benefit of the Gloves of Storing cost more, hold less, and take up a slot, as compared to the Haversack which does not.  (Actually, I rule that it takes up your back slot in my campaign, so you can't wear cloaks or capes with it, but that's a house rule, really). IMO, if you're not going to allow the stasis for magic, then you ought to drop the prices for the glove considerably.- Z a c h</blockquote>