Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Clarification on what (any race) means from a mechanical standpoint in AL?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Pauper" data-source="post: 6859473" data-attributes="member: 17607"><p>We kinda hashed these out back on the WotC boards back when...let's see if I can find my notes...ah! Note these are not official, and are meant as guidelines only, because there isn't any official guidance.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Technically, you could use any humanoid race that is in a WotC-published rules source. As the DM, you are not limited to the player-approved rules options for character creation when applying modifications to NPCs, but you can't decide that a humanoid (any race) is actually a hill giant, because hill giants aren't of type 'humanoid'.</p><p></p><p>As a general rule, though, it's cleanest to only make choices from the approved character creation rules for the season you're running -- that ensures that your choices have the greatest relevance to the adventure at hand. If you really want to use the MM (or SRD), you should probably stick to humanoids that have roughly similar hit dice to the monster write-up you're using (if the write up has two hit dice, go hobgoblin rather than bugbear, for instance).</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, if a race is available to a player as part of the Allowed Rules, you can choose that race as DM.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sub-race is part of the race choice, so this is also allowable. At this point, though, you should probably include this in your DM prep rather than doing it 'on the fly' at the table; otherwise you run the risk of slowing down the game.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, it's in the PH and approved for players, so why not you?</p><p></p><p>I probably wouldn't, though, unless I knew there was a specific feat I needed to use to balance something at the table (say, Mage-Slayer for a particularly difficult-to-crack spellcaster). Mechanically speaking, <a href="http://theangrygm.com/ask-angry-seeing-in-the-dark/" target="_blank">variant human is weaker than the standard human</a> in most cases. (See the 5th and 6th paragraphs after the question.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>As many as you want. If you think an ability won't have an impact on the encounter, such as the elf Trance ability, you don't need to include it. For balance purposes, though, you should include any abilities that are actually limitations, like the halfling's Speed.</p><p></p><p>Note as well that you shouldn't change the monster write-up as a result of adding abilities, even if it would make sense to do so -- so a humanoid monster that's listed as using a shortsword that you decide is an elf should not be 'upgraded' to a longsword even though the Elf Weapon Training ability says elves are proficient with longswords.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Monsters don't have levels. I wouldn't include level-dependent abilities unless there's a level specified for something in the monster description, such as spellcasting. A creature that is treated as a 5th level spellcaster can also be treated as 5th level for other abilities.</p><p></p><p>If you insist on including them, a decent rule of thumb would be to use the target level of the adventure as the level for those abilities. You might try hit dice, but that's not necessarily consistent among different monster write-ups -- for example, a bugbear has five hit dice, but doesn't have Multiattack like a 5th level melee PC would, so is it really 5th level?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>That would be very suitable for an adventure set during Season 2 (Elemental Evil), but not quite so 'on theme' for a Season 4 adventure. If it were a Season 3 adventure, you could make them drow elves and be on-theme. Season 1, kobolds. I don't see why you couldn't include genasi in a Season 4 adventure, but it might not have the same impact as a choice made within the context of the Curse of Strahd season, say, a were-rat. (Note that you wouldn't replace the guards' attacks with the were-rat's attacks, since the monster already has defined attacks (which means you couldn't use this as a back-door way to inflict lycanthropy on your player characters). You could include the were-rat's Keen Smell, though, if you thought it would have an impact on the encounter, say, to help them keep track of a rogue who likes to use the Hide skill a lot.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you're planning something like that, I'm guessing you're trying to out-munchkin your players. Good luck with that!</p><p></p><p>--</p><p>Pauper</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Pauper, post: 6859473, member: 17607"] We kinda hashed these out back on the WotC boards back when...let's see if I can find my notes...ah! Note these are not official, and are meant as guidelines only, because there isn't any official guidance. Technically, you could use any humanoid race that is in a WotC-published rules source. As the DM, you are not limited to the player-approved rules options for character creation when applying modifications to NPCs, but you can't decide that a humanoid (any race) is actually a hill giant, because hill giants aren't of type 'humanoid'. As a general rule, though, it's cleanest to only make choices from the approved character creation rules for the season you're running -- that ensures that your choices have the greatest relevance to the adventure at hand. If you really want to use the MM (or SRD), you should probably stick to humanoids that have roughly similar hit dice to the monster write-up you're using (if the write up has two hit dice, go hobgoblin rather than bugbear, for instance). Yes, if a race is available to a player as part of the Allowed Rules, you can choose that race as DM. Sub-race is part of the race choice, so this is also allowable. At this point, though, you should probably include this in your DM prep rather than doing it 'on the fly' at the table; otherwise you run the risk of slowing down the game. Sure, it's in the PH and approved for players, so why not you? I probably wouldn't, though, unless I knew there was a specific feat I needed to use to balance something at the table (say, Mage-Slayer for a particularly difficult-to-crack spellcaster). Mechanically speaking, [url="http://theangrygm.com/ask-angry-seeing-in-the-dark/"]variant human is weaker than the standard human[/url] in most cases. (See the 5th and 6th paragraphs after the question.) As many as you want. If you think an ability won't have an impact on the encounter, such as the elf Trance ability, you don't need to include it. For balance purposes, though, you should include any abilities that are actually limitations, like the halfling's Speed. Note as well that you shouldn't change the monster write-up as a result of adding abilities, even if it would make sense to do so -- so a humanoid monster that's listed as using a shortsword that you decide is an elf should not be 'upgraded' to a longsword even though the Elf Weapon Training ability says elves are proficient with longswords. Monsters don't have levels. I wouldn't include level-dependent abilities unless there's a level specified for something in the monster description, such as spellcasting. A creature that is treated as a 5th level spellcaster can also be treated as 5th level for other abilities. If you insist on including them, a decent rule of thumb would be to use the target level of the adventure as the level for those abilities. You might try hit dice, but that's not necessarily consistent among different monster write-ups -- for example, a bugbear has five hit dice, but doesn't have Multiattack like a 5th level melee PC would, so is it really 5th level? That would be very suitable for an adventure set during Season 2 (Elemental Evil), but not quite so 'on theme' for a Season 4 adventure. If it were a Season 3 adventure, you could make them drow elves and be on-theme. Season 1, kobolds. I don't see why you couldn't include genasi in a Season 4 adventure, but it might not have the same impact as a choice made within the context of the Curse of Strahd season, say, a were-rat. (Note that you wouldn't replace the guards' attacks with the were-rat's attacks, since the monster already has defined attacks (which means you couldn't use this as a back-door way to inflict lycanthropy on your player characters). You could include the were-rat's Keen Smell, though, if you thought it would have an impact on the encounter, say, to help them keep track of a rogue who likes to use the Hide skill a lot.) If you're planning something like that, I'm guessing you're trying to out-munchkin your players. Good luck with that! -- Pauper [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Clarification on what (any race) means from a mechanical standpoint in AL?
Top