Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Clases of Incarnum
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Dark Psion" data-source="post: 2621125" data-attributes="member: 959"><p>I am have trouble "seeing" the new classes in the Magc Of Incarnum, the Incarnate, the Soulborn and the Totemist. With previous books, something would immediately come to mind as I read the description of a new class. With the original Psionic handbook came the Psychic Warrior and Xena was the Iconic version of that for me. With the Expanded Psionic Handbook came the Wilder and Robin from Witch Hunter Robin came to mind. She only does fire, but she does it quite well.</p><p></p><p>But with these new classes, very little is comming to me to visualize them. Now the Soulborn does remind me of Kazuma from <a href="http://www.scryedanime.com/home.html" target="_blank">sCryed</a>. </p><p></p><p>But the Incarnate??</p><p></p><p>Maybe it is the Alignment aspects that are throwing me. I understand why Paladins are LG and why Druids are Neutral, but why are Incarnates so extreme in their alignment? Yes, soulmelds are divided by alignment, but they could just as easily be divided by Elements, signs of the Zodiac or something else.</p><p></p><p>The Totemist is a little easier to see, but the "Illiteracy" is a strange class feature to include. How many character designs are wiped out by that one word? And the feats in the book are very uninspired, spend a point to gain a point of ___________.</p><p></p><p>And yes, yes I could just ignore those aspects, but I am trying to understand the thinking behind these classes. Why did alignment become so infused with them during the design stage? At what point did they decide that a Totemist shouldn't be able to read? And were they running out of Essetia when they got to the feat section?</p><p></p><p>Another aspect that bothers me a little is the fact that they just "know" all their Soulmelds. Part of the fun of creating Wizards and Psions is in creating new spells and powers. When Magic of Eberron comes out, do all Artificers get an internet update for any new Infusions in the book?</p><p></p><p>So, if you have already created Incarnum characters, who do you see them as? What was your inspiration? </p><p></p><p>Or are you as confused as I am? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f609.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" data-smilie="2"data-shortname=";)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Dark Psion, post: 2621125, member: 959"] I am have trouble "seeing" the new classes in the Magc Of Incarnum, the Incarnate, the Soulborn and the Totemist. With previous books, something would immediately come to mind as I read the description of a new class. With the original Psionic handbook came the Psychic Warrior and Xena was the Iconic version of that for me. With the Expanded Psionic Handbook came the Wilder and Robin from Witch Hunter Robin came to mind. She only does fire, but she does it quite well. But with these new classes, very little is comming to me to visualize them. Now the Soulborn does remind me of Kazuma from [url=http://www.scryedanime.com/home.html]sCryed[/url]. But the Incarnate?? Maybe it is the Alignment aspects that are throwing me. I understand why Paladins are LG and why Druids are Neutral, but why are Incarnates so extreme in their alignment? Yes, soulmelds are divided by alignment, but they could just as easily be divided by Elements, signs of the Zodiac or something else. The Totemist is a little easier to see, but the "Illiteracy" is a strange class feature to include. How many character designs are wiped out by that one word? And the feats in the book are very uninspired, spend a point to gain a point of ___________. And yes, yes I could just ignore those aspects, but I am trying to understand the thinking behind these classes. Why did alignment become so infused with them during the design stage? At what point did they decide that a Totemist shouldn't be able to read? And were they running out of Essetia when they got to the feat section? Another aspect that bothers me a little is the fact that they just "know" all their Soulmelds. Part of the fun of creating Wizards and Psions is in creating new spells and powers. When Magic of Eberron comes out, do all Artificers get an internet update for any new Infusions in the book? So, if you have already created Incarnum characters, who do you see them as? What was your inspiration? Or are you as confused as I am? ;) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Clases of Incarnum
Top