Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Klaus" data-source="post: 4945195" data-attributes="member: 607">Mechanics aside, even the plain text isn't up to the usual standards. For one, I don't much care for the inclusion of "feats" and "builds" into the parlance of the game world. When presenting the two captains responsible for the "greatweapon build", the options for accuracy feats, etc, are presented within each, as if they were particular to each one's approach, but the topics and suggestions are at times antagonistic to the captain's strategy.And the following sentence is just poorly written:"Instead of building up your defenses to compensate for your low defenses, focus on hit points".Really, this article and the Fighter Essentials it was expanded from were big messes (the Essentials article had feats with different names from the table and the text, etc).</blockquote>