Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="A.J.gibson" data-source="post: 5290670" data-attributes="member: 94134">Hi Klaus. I just want to take a moment and try to clarify what's going on; I've seen a lot of very positive and some very negative comments about your article in several places. It's really not fair.Basically, your article is like a gourmet gelato - really good stuff - but for the sorcerer, it's the middle of winter.To answer your question above; there is absolutely nothing wrong with giving the barbarian ranged attacks. The problem is your article assumes the barbarian already has ranged attacks. For people playing a ranged-attack barbarian, this is a godsend, but for most of us, it's not very useful.When I read your article, I was intrigued, but also bothered by the missed opportunities. A weapon-using sorcerer is a cool idea, but you've fixated on daggers. For example: why can't Master of Knives grant you the ability to use any light blade as a weapon and implement in place of a dagger? This would open up many possibilities for swashbuckling sorcerers, and make multi-classing or hybriding into bard and swordmage more interesting. I know the focus of your article was roguish-sorcerers, but there is no harm in making the individual components a little broader.</blockquote>