Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="evilbob" data-source="post: 6361610" data-attributes="member: 9789">I'm not really sure I see the full problem here, either.&nbsp; 9th level spells break the game:&nbsp; yes.&nbsp; But how many games even get to 17th level?&nbsp; And at 20th level nearly every class is insane somehow.&nbsp; Druids pretty much cannot die from HP loss at that point; that's a fun one to compare.For the sweet spot of &gt;90% of games - levels ~3-6 - the two classes seem pretty even.&nbsp; Well, actually the bard seems like it couldn't quite keep up with the fighter if all it wanted to do was be a fighter.&nbsp; But it CAN be very effective in making the entire party better.&nbsp; So that seems good.Will casters start to dominate at high levels?&nbsp; Yup.&nbsp; Is that a playstyle that a lot of people want anyway?&nbsp; I think so.&nbsp; Is that a level range very, very few people ever see?&nbsp; Pretty sure.I am curious what this Indomitable feature that got nerfed was and is:&nbsp; can anyone paraphrase what it is now and also say what it was before?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="evilbob, post: 6361610, member: 9789"] I'm not really sure I see the full problem here, either. 9th level spells break the game: yes. But how many games even get to 17th level? And at 20th level nearly every class is insane somehow. Druids pretty much cannot die from HP loss at that point; that's a fun one to compare. For the sweet spot of >90% of games - levels ~3-6 - the two classes seem pretty even. Well, actually the bard seems like it couldn't quite keep up with the fighter if all it wanted to do was be a fighter. But it CAN be very effective in making the entire party better. So that seems good. Will casters start to dominate at high levels? Yup. Is that a playstyle that a lot of people want anyway? I think so. Is that a level range very, very few people ever see? Pretty sure. I am curious what this Indomitable feature that got nerfed was and is: can anyone paraphrase what it is now and also say what it was before? [/QUOTE]

Verification