Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Class Analysis: Fighter and Bard
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andor" data-source="post: 6362850" data-attributes="member: 1879"><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Nonsense. A Fighter, even the Champion you are fixated on, has access via a single feat to spells like Detect Magic and Water Breathing. While there are not quite as many ritual spells in 5e as I would like, the list does include some very good utility spells like Water Walking/Breathing, Detect Magic, Identify, Speak With Animals, or Leomunds Tiny Hut. If we are discussing out of combat utility the fact that they are rituals rather than instant cast spells is meaningless.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Look, to be clear, you are not wrong, and Sacrosancts position is absurd. (With apologies, but it is.) However there are other points which you yourself are steadfastly ignoring to the detriment of your credibility.</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>First, there are no non-caster classes in 5e. Not one. There are only some non-caster subclasses for those who do not wish to use the spell system. Yes, it's true that people without spells do not have spells. So what? They don't have them because, and only because, they didn't want them. That is not a system flaw, it is providing options to players. And yes, "I don't want that." is a valid option. Do you really think that having chosen Champion in the first place and after bypassing 19 opportunities to multi-class the player of the 20th level Fighter will be crying into his beer about how the Wizard emasculated him?</strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>Secondly, many of your examples do not in fact invalidate the classes you claim they invalidate. If the Bards Song of Rest is contributing to the party it adds exactly as many HP to the Fighters pool as the Bards. Yes it's more healing overall, but so what? The fighter was never in that race to begin with. If Faerie fire does more in a single spell than the fighter does all combat, so what? It's <em>using the fighter to do it</em> (in part) and thereby stealing no ones thunder. In all seriousness when have you <em>ever</em> heard a front line character complain that he felt obsoleted by the bonuses provided by a support class? </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>The experience of play is important. White room analysis of DPR is not. If a fighter feels useless in play, that is a problem. It's not neccessarily the classes problem however, it will be a result of interaction between the DM and the Figher and Wizards players that leads to that feeling. And if it makes the fighters player unhappy he can retire his Champion and bring in an Eldritch Knight, or a Druid or a Monk. </strong></p><p><strong></strong></p><p><strong>In a white room the Champion is not the equal of the Wizard, but at the table where things are messy with cheeto dust and coffee stains, they can be equal amounts of fun to play and that's what matters.</strong></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andor, post: 6362850, member: 1879"] [B] Nonsense. A Fighter, even the Champion you are fixated on, has access via a single feat to spells like Detect Magic and Water Breathing. While there are not quite as many ritual spells in 5e as I would like, the list does include some very good utility spells like Water Walking/Breathing, Detect Magic, Identify, Speak With Animals, or Leomunds Tiny Hut. If we are discussing out of combat utility the fact that they are rituals rather than instant cast spells is meaningless. Look, to be clear, you are not wrong, and Sacrosancts position is absurd. (With apologies, but it is.) However there are other points which you yourself are steadfastly ignoring to the detriment of your credibility. First, there are no non-caster classes in 5e. Not one. There are only some non-caster subclasses for those who do not wish to use the spell system. Yes, it's true that people without spells do not have spells. So what? They don't have them because, and only because, they didn't want them. That is not a system flaw, it is providing options to players. And yes, "I don't want that." is a valid option. Do you really think that having chosen Champion in the first place and after bypassing 19 opportunities to multi-class the player of the 20th level Fighter will be crying into his beer about how the Wizard emasculated him? Secondly, many of your examples do not in fact invalidate the classes you claim they invalidate. If the Bards Song of Rest is contributing to the party it adds exactly as many HP to the Fighters pool as the Bards. Yes it's more healing overall, but so what? The fighter was never in that race to begin with. If Faerie fire does more in a single spell than the fighter does all combat, so what? It's [i]using the fighter to do it[/i] (in part) and thereby stealing no ones thunder. In all seriousness when have you [i]ever[/i] heard a front line character complain that he felt obsoleted by the bonuses provided by a support class? The experience of play is important. White room analysis of DPR is not. If a fighter feels useless in play, that is a problem. It's not neccessarily the classes problem however, it will be a result of interaction between the DM and the Figher and Wizards players that leads to that feeling. And if it makes the fighters player unhappy he can retire his Champion and bring in an Eldritch Knight, or a Druid or a Monk. In a white room the Champion is not the equal of the Wizard, but at the table where things are messy with cheeto dust and coffee stains, they can be equal amounts of fun to play and that's what matters.[/b] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Class Analysis: Fighter and Bard
Top