Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Class Analysis: Fighter and Bard
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jack the Lad" data-source="post: 6366028" data-attributes="member: 6777377"><p>I don't see how this disagrees with any of what I said. We're told in the Fighter design goals that:<p style="margin-left: 20px"></p> <p style="margin-left: 20px">Other classes might have nifty tricks, powerful spells, and other abilities, but when it’s time to put down a monster without dying in the process, the fighter should be our best class.</p><p></p><p>and<p style="margin-left: 20px">Too often in D&D, the high-level fighter is the flunky to a high-level wizard. It’s all too easy for combinations of spells to make the wizard a far more potent enemy or character, especially if a wizard can unleash his or her spells in rapid succession. A wizard might annihilate a small army of orcs with a volley of fireballs and cones of cold. The fighter does the same sword blow by sword blow, taking down waves of orcs each round. <em><strong>Balancing the classes at high levels is perhaps the highest priority for the fighter, and attaining balance is something that we must do to make D&D fit in with fantasy, myth, and legend</strong></em>. Even if a wizard unleashes every spell at his or her disposal at a fighter, the fighter absorbs the punishment, throws off the effects, and keeps on fighting.</p> <p style="margin-left: 20px"></p><p></p><p>Emphasis mine. There's no possible way of interpreting this to mean that they intended to have Wizards be as powerful as they are and Fighters be Gimli.</p><p></p><p>If we look at LotR, (briefly; I <em>really </em>don't want to make this about LotR. I've seen that whole thing argued out a hundred times) <a href="http://odd74.proboards.com/thread/5837" target="_blank">Gandalf does not cast spells all that often, and they are not especially powerful ones</a>. He's not teleporting the Fellowship to Mount Doom. He's not Flying around throwing Fireballs at orcs. And even then he's often offscreen to give the martial characters a chance to shine or step in to save them. In D&D terms he's a DMPC at most, or more likely an NPC.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>They promised me (and everyone else) a Fighter who is balanced with the Wizard.</p><p></p><p>Being Gimli or Legolas is fine when the Wizard's spell list is Bless, Command Person, Control Smoke, Control Water, Enhance Presence, Extinguish Flame, Flash / Spark of Light, Hold Portal, Ignite Small Fire, Knock, Loud Noise, Light, Shatter and Ventriloquism.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jack the Lad, post: 6366028, member: 6777377"] I don't see how this disagrees with any of what I said. We're told in the Fighter design goals that:[INDENT] Other classes might have nifty tricks, powerful spells, and other abilities, but when it’s time to put down a monster without dying in the process, the fighter should be our best class.[/INDENT] and[INDENT]Too often in D&D, the high-level fighter is the flunky to a high-level wizard. It’s all too easy for combinations of spells to make the wizard a far more potent enemy or character, especially if a wizard can unleash his or her spells in rapid succession. A wizard might annihilate a small army of orcs with a volley of fireballs and cones of cold. The fighter does the same sword blow by sword blow, taking down waves of orcs each round. [I][B]Balancing the classes at high levels is perhaps the highest priority for the fighter, and attaining balance is something that we must do to make D&D fit in with fantasy, myth, and legend[/B][/I]. Even if a wizard unleashes every spell at his or her disposal at a fighter, the fighter absorbs the punishment, throws off the effects, and keeps on fighting. [/INDENT] Emphasis mine. There's no possible way of interpreting this to mean that they intended to have Wizards be as powerful as they are and Fighters be Gimli. If we look at LotR, (briefly; I [I]really [/I]don't want to make this about LotR. I've seen that whole thing argued out a hundred times) [URL="http://odd74.proboards.com/thread/5837"]Gandalf does not cast spells all that often, and they are not especially powerful ones[/URL]. He's not teleporting the Fellowship to Mount Doom. He's not Flying around throwing Fireballs at orcs. And even then he's often offscreen to give the martial characters a chance to shine or step in to save them. In D&D terms he's a DMPC at most, or more likely an NPC. They promised me (and everyone else) a Fighter who is balanced with the Wizard. Being Gimli or Legolas is fine when the Wizard's spell list is Bless, Command Person, Control Smoke, Control Water, Enhance Presence, Extinguish Flame, Flash / Spark of Light, Hold Portal, Ignite Small Fire, Knock, Loud Noise, Light, Shatter and Ventriloquism. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Class Analysis: Fighter and Bard
Top