Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Aldarc" data-source="post: 5783707" data-attributes="member: 5142"><p>You are still not explaining the logical leap between Pathfinder's success and "unbroken" wizards. As I said earlier: "People may be happier to play a more familiar Vancian system than 4E's regardless of PF's balance. Ever thought of that?" Where is this possibility factored into it? Where is the possibility of people having other issues with 4E that they were more than willing to deal with PF's magic imbalance? Where are the different business models betwen Paizo and WotC factored into this? That's why it's absolutely absurd to suggest that "wizard isn't broke because Pathfinder is successful." It's like saying that Windows must not have bugs or performance issues, or even the Blue Screen of Death, because it outsells Linux and Macs.</p></blockquote><p></p>