Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="The Little Raven" data-source="post: 5513099" data-attributes="member: 10095">What gets me is that every official mention of the Class Compendium book and later the replacement articles is very clear about the 5 classes being covered being the PHB1 versions with any new errata needed written in the overly verbose Essentials layout, but people still jump to the conclusion (with no actual evidence, since they've been pretty clear on which articles/books will feature new Essentials-style subclasses and which will not) that it means we are getting new subclasses ala the Slayer.People complain about WotC's lack of communication on some fronts, yet many don't pay attention to the actual information they do communicate and complain when their artificially constructed expectations are not met. Being disappointed by the Monster Builder not being a builder makes sense, since the name and advertisement email gave unmet expectations straight from the horse's mouth, but being disappointed by the Warlord article being exactly what they said it would be (the PHB1 Warlord reprinted) just strikes me as people actively seeking something to be upset about.</blockquote>