Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Class Granularity
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="jaer" data-source="post: 4040708" data-attributes="member: 57861"><p>I think we are exactly on the same page, here.</p><p></p><p>In my mind, the choices of powers and abilities better fits in with your style. You develope the character and can base your choices on the selection given as you level up. At 12th lvl, your character might not look the way you thought they would when you started out at 1st level, but that is the way the campaign shaped that character, and that is awesome.</p><p></p><p>PrCs, in my mind, go against this because you need to plan they out and force them along the way. At 1st level, certains skills and feats were picked, and the trend continues on as you rise towards that PrC; because it was decided at 1st level that this character would take x, y, and z and be in this PrC by 8th lvl, the mentality is there to continue in that direction even if it doesn't fit the character anymore. And likewise, it is not often a character just randomly has the skills, feats, and what-not required to enter a PrC without planning.</p><p></p><p>The best example of PrCs not flowing freely is the Blackguard. Pre-req Imp Sunder? What PC paladin has Imp Sunder naturally? Any paladin who has it, though, the other PCs must be thinking "is he planning on going blackguard?" (which is, to me, stupid...I realize the player can plan on having his character go bad without the character planning on going bad, but it just seems like bad form!).</p><p></p><p>While I realize D&D is mainly for good characters and typically it is not meant for the PC's Paladin to go bad, but if it should happen, if the situation is perfect that the paladin should go bad, why does he need to slog through a few more levels until he meets the Blackgaurd PrC?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="jaer, post: 4040708, member: 57861"] I think we are exactly on the same page, here. In my mind, the choices of powers and abilities better fits in with your style. You develope the character and can base your choices on the selection given as you level up. At 12th lvl, your character might not look the way you thought they would when you started out at 1st level, but that is the way the campaign shaped that character, and that is awesome. PrCs, in my mind, go against this because you need to plan they out and force them along the way. At 1st level, certains skills and feats were picked, and the trend continues on as you rise towards that PrC; because it was decided at 1st level that this character would take x, y, and z and be in this PrC by 8th lvl, the mentality is there to continue in that direction even if it doesn't fit the character anymore. And likewise, it is not often a character just randomly has the skills, feats, and what-not required to enter a PrC without planning. The best example of PrCs not flowing freely is the Blackguard. Pre-req Imp Sunder? What PC paladin has Imp Sunder naturally? Any paladin who has it, though, the other PCs must be thinking "is he planning on going blackguard?" (which is, to me, stupid...I realize the player can plan on having his character go bad without the character planning on going bad, but it just seems like bad form!). While I realize D&D is mainly for good characters and typically it is not meant for the PC's Paladin to go bad, but if it should happen, if the situation is perfect that the paladin should go bad, why does he need to slog through a few more levels until he meets the Blackgaurd PrC? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Class Granularity
Top