Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Olrox17" data-source="post: 8008855" data-attributes="member: 6801397">It is more complicated, yeah, but the potential design space is so juicy and alluring! Not just for the druid, either. I would be very intrigued to see half-caster sorcerer subclasses that really dig deep into their ancestry, instead of just going pew pew with the same 5 optimal spells everyone always uses.The Warden was Bad-Ass! Cool primal forms, disgusting toughness, unique powers, I would love to see it back. I very much doubt it'll ever be a standalone 5e class though, the devs are clearly trying to keep full classes to a minimum, I was honestly shocked when they decided to make the Artificer an actual class.We might get a Warden-like subclass, hopefully for the ranger class rather than the druid. The druid might be more thematically linked to the warden, but all that spell casting prowess would leave too little design space to make a decent warden.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Olrox17, post: 8008855, member: 6801397"] It is more complicated, yeah, but the potential design space is so juicy and alluring! Not just for the druid, either. I would be very intrigued to see half-caster sorcerer subclasses that really dig deep into their ancestry, instead of just going pew pew with the same 5 optimal spells everyone always uses. The Warden was Bad-Ass! Cool primal forms, disgusting toughness, unique powers, I would love to see it back. I very much doubt it'll ever be a standalone 5e class though, the devs are clearly trying to keep full classes to a minimum, I was honestly shocked when they decided to make the Artificer an actual class. We might get a Warden-like subclass, hopefully for the ranger class rather than the druid. The druid might be more thematically linked to the warden, but all that spell casting prowess would leave too little design space to make a decent warden. [/QUOTE]

Verification