Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="glass" data-source="post: 8062468" data-attributes="member: 12251">Sounds good to me. Although regarding the first bullet point I would not get too upset if it ends up only being meaningful choices at say 17 out of 20 levels (and the other three levels get upgrades to previously selected features.Some people apparently want that, but there are plenty of classes in the PHB that provide that experience. Since this is going to be compatible, there is no need to reinvent the wheel with them. The Level Up classes should all be more mechanically interesting than that IMNSHO.Pathfinder 2e is in no way compaitble with D&amp;D 5e, and uses much bigger numbers.I would suggest that Monte Cook's Arcana Unearthed/Evolved is somewhere to look for a different kind of inspiration. I think the new book should have its own set of classes, covering broadly the same ground as those in the PHB but not mapping exactly one-to-one. Usable on their own, or alongside those in the PHB._glass.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="glass, post: 8062468, member: 12251"] Sounds good to me. Although regarding the first bullet point I would not get too upset if it ends up only being meaningful choices at say 17 out of 20 levels (and the other three levels get upgrades to previously selected features. Some people apparently want that, but there are plenty of classes in the PHB that provide that experience. Since this is going to be compatible, there is no need to reinvent the wheel with them. The Level Up classes should all be more mechanically interesting than that IMNSHO. Pathfinder 2e is in no way compaitble with D&D 5e, and uses [I]much[/I] bigger numbers. I would suggest that Monte Cook's Arcana Unearthed/Evolved is somewhere to look for a different kind of inspiration. I think the new book should have its own set of classes, covering broadly the same ground as those in the PHB but not mapping exactly one-to-one. Usable on their own, or alongside those in the PHB. _ glass. [/QUOTE]

Verification