Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Class revisions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Eldorian" data-source="post: 746535" data-attributes="member: 10504"><p>What I'd most like to see is the Druid taken away from the shapeshifting path and given domains based on terrain, but since that's not possible, perhaps a major spell list revision, to flesh out less than competetive selection. The bard is a very good class... If you multiclass to a warrior type. As it stands, the class by itself is pretty weak, perhaps better bardic abilites tied to bard level, and some more spells per day. The spell list is pretty decent I think. The monk only needs more ki strike, and perhaps more customizablity. Better rules for unarmed attacks would be appriciated too, and perhaps the ability to use a monk weapon with monk damage. The ranger needs a complete overhall, and I am unsure of what exactly it neads. Definatly more power later in levels, less in the earlier ones. The paladin needs his abilites to increase with level, and some higher level abilites, and perhaps a mount that has something like 3/4 his challege rating. </p><p></p><p>All that said, I believe the Druid needs the most work. The better the point-buy and the better the magic item selection, the weaker the Druid gets compared to the other PCs. This is because wildshape does not take advantage of superior physical stats, nor does it use the majority of magic items.</p><p></p><p>Eldorian Antar</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Eldorian, post: 746535, member: 10504"] What I'd most like to see is the Druid taken away from the shapeshifting path and given domains based on terrain, but since that's not possible, perhaps a major spell list revision, to flesh out less than competetive selection. The bard is a very good class... If you multiclass to a warrior type. As it stands, the class by itself is pretty weak, perhaps better bardic abilites tied to bard level, and some more spells per day. The spell list is pretty decent I think. The monk only needs more ki strike, and perhaps more customizablity. Better rules for unarmed attacks would be appriciated too, and perhaps the ability to use a monk weapon with monk damage. The ranger needs a complete overhall, and I am unsure of what exactly it neads. Definatly more power later in levels, less in the earlier ones. The paladin needs his abilites to increase with level, and some higher level abilites, and perhaps a mount that has something like 3/4 his challege rating. All that said, I believe the Druid needs the most work. The better the point-buy and the better the magic item selection, the weaker the Druid gets compared to the other PCs. This is because wildshape does not take advantage of superior physical stats, nor does it use the majority of magic items. Eldorian Antar [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Class revisions
Top