Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Class spell lists and pact magic are back!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Remathilis" data-source="post: 9093267" data-attributes="member: 7635"><p>Did subclasses starting at third level really poll well? I saw a LOT of resistance to it in terms of clerics/sorcs/warlocks, equally as much as something like wild shape or pact magic. It seems odd that people would go "I dislike getting my subclass features at a fixed rate, but please, have all subclasses start at the same level".</p><p></p><p>I think the "third level subclass" is something that was going to happen regardless of what it polled. We already know there are some things (wild shape's temp hp, twin spell) that are on the dev teams list regardless. (Another example would be racial ASI: I don't think the post-Tasha ASI could poll low enough for them to go back to fixed racial ASI).</p><p></p><p>As for the rest, I think its a wash. Nobody is horribly bothered by the Magic Action, not compared to changing a class feature. And I'm not sure at this point any of the spell changes we've seen will survive. Guidance, Barkskin, Find Familiar and Resistance haven't seen a revision. Is that because they were accepted, or is it because they polled 60% and we're getting some version of the 2014 spell back? We don't know.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>It just blows my mind NOTHING other than weapon mastery managed to excite people. And I do wonder how (after 6 packets with universal spell lists) they finally said, "oh golly gee, people don't like these!" SIX PACKETS! Did everyone finally wake up on packet 5 and say "you know what, I do not want these" or did WotC say "hmm... Maybe this change is more of a hassle than it's worth. Let's go back to the 2014 lists , it will be easier for backwards compatibility"?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Remathilis, post: 9093267, member: 7635"] Did subclasses starting at third level really poll well? I saw a LOT of resistance to it in terms of clerics/sorcs/warlocks, equally as much as something like wild shape or pact magic. It seems odd that people would go "I dislike getting my subclass features at a fixed rate, but please, have all subclasses start at the same level". I think the "third level subclass" is something that was going to happen regardless of what it polled. We already know there are some things (wild shape's temp hp, twin spell) that are on the dev teams list regardless. (Another example would be racial ASI: I don't think the post-Tasha ASI could poll low enough for them to go back to fixed racial ASI). As for the rest, I think its a wash. Nobody is horribly bothered by the Magic Action, not compared to changing a class feature. And I'm not sure at this point any of the spell changes we've seen will survive. Guidance, Barkskin, Find Familiar and Resistance haven't seen a revision. Is that because they were accepted, or is it because they polled 60% and we're getting some version of the 2014 spell back? We don't know. It just blows my mind NOTHING other than weapon mastery managed to excite people. And I do wonder how (after 6 packets with universal spell lists) they finally said, "oh golly gee, people don't like these!" SIX PACKETS! Did everyone finally wake up on packet 5 and say "you know what, I do not want these" or did WotC say "hmm... Maybe this change is more of a hassle than it's worth. Let's go back to the 2014 lists , it will be easier for backwards compatibility"? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Class spell lists and pact magic are back!
Top