Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 9100178" data-attributes="member: 93670">Yes you did &amp; you don't even see it, that's part of the problem 5e encourages by dismissing GM needs.[spoiler=&quot;right here&quot;][/spoiler]So which is it? Are the views of the segment who want MOAR power &amp; vote against anything that curbs it for any reason no matter the reason for dialing it back* whom wotc doesn't show indications of trying to correct for just &quot;as valid&quot; or are they so much more valid that primary GM's can't even make a comparison in return?&nbsp; If the views of primary GM's are so beneath concern that they aren't even justified in being discussed when they compare &amp; contrast themselves unless first waiting for you bring up primary GM's so they can talk about their consideration within the constraints of the testing is it still a matter of being &quot;as valid&quot;?* Like the earlier mentioned segment who is happy with anything wotc puts out and corrects for</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 9100178, member: 93670"] Yes you did & you don't even see it, that's part of the problem 5e encourages by dismissing GM needs. [spoiler="right here"] [/spoiler] So which is it? Are the views of the segment who want MOAR power & vote against anything that curbs it for any reason no matter the reason for dialing it back* whom wotc doesn't show indications of trying to correct for just "[I]as[/I] valid" or are they so much [I]more[/I] valid that primary GM's can't even make a comparison in return? If the views of primary GM's are so beneath concern that they aren't even justified in being discussed when they compare & contrast themselves unless first waiting for you bring up primary GM's so they can talk about their consideration within the constraints of the testing is it still a matter of being "[I]as[/I] valid"? * Like the earlier mentioned segment who is happy with anything wotc puts out [I]and[/I] corrects for [/QUOTE]

Verification