Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 9100289" data-attributes="member: 2525">They are just as valid as any other customer. And no, I did not mention DMs. And there was no sneaky &quot;I didn't see it&quot; I literally didn't mention DMs. Saying their views is as valid as &quot;you&quot; is not saying their view is anything relative to &quot;All primary DMs.&quot; But it is another instance where you're making this a personal discussion, in a weird an strangely egotistical way. In fact it's so weird that you would read the word &quot;You&quot; as &quot;All DMs in the world&quot; that I am starting to wonder if this conversation can be productive.Also why do you keep using the term GM when for D&amp;D that's not the term?Yes, the munchkins are as valid as any other consumer of D&amp;D books, including primary DMs. You think you're making a persuasive point when you're not. It's like you keep repeating &quot;Vanilla is better than Chocolate and everyone agrees!&quot; as if that's some objective statement when it's not. WOTC should not discount any of their consumers, unless those consumers literally don't care about what they put out.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 9100289, member: 2525"] They are just as valid as any other customer. And no, I did not mention DMs. And there was no sneaky "I didn't see it" I literally didn't mention DMs. Saying their views is as valid as "you" is not saying their view is anything relative to "All primary DMs." But it is another instance where you're making this a personal discussion, in a weird an strangely egotistical way. In fact it's so weird that you would read the word "You" as "All DMs in the world" that I am starting to wonder if this conversation can be productive. Also why do you keep using the term GM when for D&D that's not the term? Yes, the munchkins are as valid as any other consumer of D&D books, including primary DMs. You think you're making a persuasive point when you're not. It's like you keep repeating "Vanilla is better than Chocolate and everyone agrees!" as if that's some objective statement when it's not. WOTC should not discount any of their consumers, unless those consumers literally don't care about what they put out. [/QUOTE]

Verification