Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 9100621" data-attributes="member: 93670">You are literally tried to exclude GMs from referring to how the process being used takes steps to make their feedback &amp; concerns less &quot;valid&quot; as what we are calling the munchkin brigade.&nbsp; Every single playtest packet survey except maybe the first where there were no classes in it has included a question along the lines of &quot;have you played x class in 5e&quot; or &quot;have you played X class in any version of d&amp;d&quot;.&nbsp; not one single packet has had a survey question that made any effort to identify GMs.&nbsp; That right there is one group being explicitly more equal than another no matter how you try to spin it.It's strange that you would choose this sidequest to break from the constant efforts to provide cover for the flaws in this process through attempting to dismiss discredit &amp; divert criticism across so many threads.&nbsp; &nbsp; You won't find the ammunition you might have been expecting in the simple fact that GM plays more nicely with autocorrect autocomplete &amp; spellcheck than &quot;the term&quot;.&nbsp; Since you didn't mention it though I assume you meant the term with a <a href="https://trademarks.justia.com/742/64/dungeon-74264094.html" target="_blank">serial number of 74264094 &amp; registration number of 1815460</a>?&nbsp; If so, there is your answer.You've lost sight of the ball.&nbsp; The munchkin brigade voting against any slight to power came up because of your earlier claim that wotc lowers the veto threshold by padding the breakpoint for approval to correct for&nbsp; responders who will vote positively for anything at all.&nbsp; The GM needs to consider all of the players at the table &amp; can be expected to have a good probability of voting for healthier options a reasonable percentage of the time rather than the more selfish ones of respondents that are exclusively players &amp; only interested in their own power. Correcting for the distortions&nbsp; is responsible polling when those distortions are caused by their own weighting &amp;&nbsp; not about &quot;discounting&quot; anyone.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 9100621, member: 93670"] You are literally tried to exclude GMs from referring to how the process being used takes steps to make their feedback & concerns less "valid" as what we are calling the munchkin brigade. Every single playtest packet survey except maybe the first where there were no classes in it has included a question along the lines of "have you played x class in 5e" or "have you played X class in any version of d&d". not one single packet has had a survey question that made any effort to identify GMs. That right there is one group being explicitly more equal than another no matter how you try to spin it. It's strange that you would choose this sidequest to break from the constant efforts to provide cover for the flaws in this process through attempting to dismiss discredit & divert criticism across so many threads. You won't find the ammunition you might have been expecting in the simple fact that [B]GM plays more nicely with autocorrect autocomplete & spellcheck than "the term"[/B]. Since you didn't mention it though I assume you meant the term with a [URL='https://trademarks.justia.com/742/64/dungeon-74264094.html']serial number of 74264094 & registration number of 1815460[/URL]? If so, there is your answer. You've lost sight of the ball. The munchkin brigade voting against any slight to power came up because of your earlier claim that wotc lowers the veto threshold by padding the breakpoint for approval to correct for responders who will vote positively for anything at all. The GM needs to consider all of the players at the table & can be expected to have a good probability of voting for healthier options a reasonable percentage of the time rather than the more selfish ones of respondents that are exclusively players & only interested in their own power. [B][U]Correcting for the distortions is [I]responsible[/I] polling[/U] when those distortions are caused by their own weighting & not about "discounting" anyone.[/B] [/QUOTE]

Verification