Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Ashrym" data-source="post: 9102114" data-attributes="member: 6750235">You and I don't have the larger sample.&nbsp; WoTC does.&nbsp; What you have is conjecture based around your opinion.You and I can't speak for WotC.&nbsp; That's conjecture based around your opinion.That's what makes it an outlier or one-off.&nbsp; If it wasn't an outlier or one-off WotC would see that in the overall metric.&nbsp; Capturing a one-off is just lucky coincidence.&nbsp; The math behind statistics doesn't support the the conjecture you've based around your opinion.I explained either earlier here or in another thread (I forget which) how a neutral response can be approximated.&nbsp; Answering a survey but not answering a question indicates no strong opinion on that feature one way or the other.&nbsp; Wotc can see that information.The reality is that we do not have access to the survey results or how those results are being used.&nbsp; You don't know that anything is flawed because you don't have the information to make that assessment.&nbsp; Conjecture and speculation are not facts.&nbsp; A person (such as you) cannot claim those flaws exist because you don't have evidence to back those claims up.&nbsp; Repeating yourself won't change that.&nbsp; This is a facts over feelings discussion at this point.This seems like it's gotten extremely off topic so I'm moving away from it.&nbsp; ON TOPIC:&nbsp; Pact magic is back.&nbsp; I prefer that so I can appreciate that response.&nbsp; Spell lists are back.&nbsp; I preferred spell lists until bards were given a choice of list and I was warming up to the arcane/divine/primal spell lists at that point.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Ashrym, post: 9102114, member: 6750235"] You and I don't have the larger sample. WoTC does. What you have is conjecture based around your opinion. You and I can't speak for WotC. That's conjecture based around your opinion. That's what makes it an outlier or one-off. If it wasn't an outlier or one-off WotC would see that in the overall metric. Capturing a one-off is just lucky coincidence. The math behind statistics doesn't support the the conjecture you've based around your opinion. I explained either earlier here or in another thread (I forget which) how a neutral response can be approximated. Answering a survey but not answering a question indicates no strong opinion on that feature one way or the other. Wotc can see that information. The reality is that we do not have access to the survey results or how those results are being used. You don't know that anything is flawed because you don't have the information to make that assessment. Conjecture and speculation are not facts. A person (such as you) cannot claim those flaws exist because you don't have evidence to back those claims up. Repeating yourself won't change that. This is a facts over feelings discussion at this point. This seems like it's gotten extremely off topic so I'm moving away from it. ON TOPIC: Pact magic is back. I prefer that so I can appreciate that response. Spell lists are back. I preferred spell lists until bards were given a choice of list and I was warming up to the arcane/divine/primal spell lists at that point. [/QUOTE]

Verification