Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Maxperson" data-source="post: 9102346" data-attributes="member: 23751">You know he's discussing WotC's product and it's polling flaws, right?&nbsp; He's not talking about himself and what he does.Again, this is wrong. It means something because it CAN mean something is wrong with the product.&nbsp; It's a very foolish company that ignores a failure found in the first 10 QC attempts and doesn't investigate further.&nbsp; An example was given from the last video.&nbsp; Crawford expressed confusion that their polling indicated that a class or subclass(I can't remember which now) indicated a neutral view when voting on the individual abilities(ie one got somewhat favorable and the next somewhat unfavorable), yet the class as a whole was voted somewhat unfavorable.That confusion shows very clearly that they don't understand their polling very well, because of the flaws in the way they go about it.The methodology which many have been talking about as being flawed for years AND the video showing that their main designer doesn't understand it.&nbsp; Their main designer not understanding it is pretty bad.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Maxperson, post: 9102346, member: 23751"] You know he's discussing WotC's product and it's polling flaws, right? He's not talking about himself and what he does. Again, this is wrong. It means something because it CAN mean something is wrong with the product. It's a very foolish company that ignores a failure found in the first 10 QC attempts and doesn't investigate further. An example was given from the last video. Crawford expressed confusion that their polling indicated that a class or subclass(I can't remember which now) indicated a neutral view when voting on the individual abilities(ie one got somewhat favorable and the next somewhat unfavorable), yet the class as a whole was voted somewhat unfavorable. That confusion shows very clearly that they don't understand their polling very well, because of the flaws in the way they go about it. The methodology which many have been talking about as being flawed for years AND the video showing that their main designer doesn't understand it. Their main designer not understanding it is pretty bad. [/QUOTE]

Verification