Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="tetrasodium" data-source="post: 9102398" data-attributes="member: 93670">In the interest of being fair to JC... While I agree with everything in this quote there is a nonzero chance that the Jeremy Crawford quote in question is not a matter of JC personally believing that completely bonkers statement.&nbsp; The other possibility is a common scenario where the face/public spokesperson for a company it directed from on high (ie some level of senior management) that the company has decided to ignore all sanity in polling and adopt a view that aligns with some MBA's vision or the company's bottom line.&nbsp; The alternative in such scenarios is often quit and call victim to some contract already in place while the company just pays someone else to say it. It eventually came out that some of 4e's peculiar choices were due to management on high pushing for the team to develop new IP rather than use existing well loved stuff so it's not outside the realm of possibilities.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="tetrasodium, post: 9102398, member: 93670"] In the interest of being fair to JC... While I agree with everything in this quote there is a nonzero chance that the Jeremy Crawford quote in question is not a matter of JC personally believing that completely bonkers statement. The other possibility is a common scenario where the face/public spokesperson for a company it directed from on high (ie some level of senior management) that the company has decided to ignore all sanity in polling and adopt a view that aligns with some MBA's vision or the company's bottom line. The alternative in such scenarios is often quit and call victim to some contract already in place while the company just pays someone else to say it. It eventually came out that some of 4e's peculiar choices were due to management on high pushing for the team to develop new IP rather than use existing well loved stuff so it's not outside the realm of possibilities. [/QUOTE]

Verification