Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Chaosmancer" data-source="post: 9106264" data-attributes="member: 6801228">I never claimed that that big companies are ALWAYS run well... but if they aren't USUALLY run well, then how do they become big, successful companies? And, while you want to claim that the specific is how the survey was conducted... you actually haven't demonstrated that this survey style is bad. This is a survey style used nearly universally, so how can you claim that the data is not being received properly? It is a tried and true method of polling. It is nearly identical to just rating things from 1 to 4, and that isn't something that is considered bad survey practice, in general.You make assumptions constantly. Just because I'm not willing to call WoTC incompetent without evidence, you want to say I think they are infallible. Just because I don't see enough evidence to assume the survey is flawed, you assume I have spent zero effort attempting to understand how it functions. Stop making assumptions.Well, if you grant that 80% is &quot;good enough to not REQUIRE further improvement&quot; then logically 70% would be &quot;good enough to keep as is, but can be tweaked&quot; wouldn't it? I mean, JC did lay out exactly what each category meant early on, so I'm not sure why you are acting like this needs to be divined.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Chaosmancer, post: 9106264, member: 6801228"] I never claimed that that big companies are ALWAYS run well... but if they aren't USUALLY run well, then how do they become big, successful companies? And, while you want to claim that the specific is how the survey was conducted... you actually haven't demonstrated that this survey style is bad. This is a survey style used nearly universally, so how can you claim that the data is not being received properly? It is a tried and true method of polling. It is nearly identical to just rating things from 1 to 4, and that isn't something that is considered bad survey practice, in general. You make assumptions constantly. Just because I'm not willing to call WoTC incompetent without evidence, you want to say I think they are infallible. Just because I don't see enough evidence to assume the survey is flawed, you assume I have spent zero effort attempting to understand how it functions. Stop making assumptions. Well, if you grant that 80% is "good enough to not REQUIRE further improvement" then logically 70% would be "good enough to keep as is, but can be tweaked" wouldn't it? I mean, JC did lay out exactly what each category meant early on, so I'm not sure why you are acting like this needs to be divined. [/QUOTE]

Verification